Exam 14: Bargaining
Exam 1: The One Lessor of Business54 Questions
Exam 2: Benefits, Costs, and Decisions67 Questions
Exam 3: Extent How Much Decisions76 Questions
Exam 4: Investment Decisions: Look Ahead and Reason Back85 Questions
Exam 5: Simple Pricing87 Questions
Exam 6: Economies of Scale and Scope63 Questions
Exam 7: Understanding Markets and Industry Changes82 Questions
Exam 8: Market Structure and Long Run Equilibrium73 Questions
Exam 9: Strategy: the Quest to Keep Profit From Eroding71 Questions
Exam 10: Foreign Exchange, Trade, and Bubbles83 Questions
Exam 11: More Realistic and Complex Pricing72 Questions
Exam 12: Direct Price Discrimination84 Questions
Exam 13: Strategic Games91 Questions
Exam 14: Bargaining82 Questions
Exam 15: Making Decisions With Uncertainty87 Questions
Exam 16: Auctions100 Questions
Exam 17: The Problem of Adverse Selection85 Questions
Exam 18: The Problem of Moral Hazard85 Questions
Exam 19: Getting Employees to Work in the Firms Best Interest108 Questions
Exam 20: Getting Divisions to Work in the Firms Best Interest115 Questions
Exam 21: Managing Vertical Relationships84 Questions
Select questions type
In the simultaneous move labor negotiation game:
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(27)
Correct Answer:
C
If,during the negotiations between the union and the management a strike occurs,it would be because
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(32)
Correct Answer:
C
A company that rewards its salespeople based on the number of sales made can expect
Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
Correct Answer:
B
For the following question
Consider a simultaneous move game between a union and a company.If both the parties bargain hard,each would gain nothing.If only one party bargains hard the accommodating party gets a profit of $1 million while the bargaining party gets a $5 million,while if they both accommodate,they each get $3 million.
-If the Union threatens a strike,what is the firm's best response?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
Under the non-strategic view of bargaining,the terms of agreement are determined by
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)
Use the following setup for question
Consider a non-strategic game between a firm and its union.The value to the firm of getting the workers back to work is $5 million.The union's agreement value to get back to work is $5 million.The firm can hire nonunion workers,"scabs",so their disagreement value is 1 million and the union members can find temporary employment elsewhere,making the unions disagreement value $2million.
-The union would have a better bargaining position in the negotiations if
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)
Armpit Homunculus
Prescott Pharmaceuticals is facing class action suit over side effects caused by its latest growth supplement.The lawyers representing the class are asking $200 million because they claim Prescott knew about and hid the fact that the supplement caused Armpit Homunculus.Prescott claims it had no foreknowledge of this and can take their chance at trial where they expect a $50 million payment.Just before the trial date,an internal Prescott email is discovered in which Dr.Colbert,D.F.A.is joking about "how hideous the armpits will be on all these giants." How does this affect the likely cost of settling the case?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(32)
When buying a car from a commission salesman you improve your bargaining position by
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)
use the following setup
Consider a sequential game between a shopkeeper and a haggling customer.The party who moves first chooses either a high price ($50)or low price ($20)and the second mover either agrees to the price or walks away from the deal and neither party gets anything.Ignore costs and assume the customer values the item at $60.
-Would the customer be able to convince the shopkeeper that he would walk out if he receives a high price?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(28)
Jill,a bookkeeper,just received an attractive offer from an outside firm and so she asks for a raise from her current employer.She would be in a strong bargaining position because
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(47)
John Nash,the mathematician responsible for the Nash equilibrium,also proved that any reasonable bargaining outcome would
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)
For the following question
Consider a simultaneous move game between a union and a company.If both the parties bargain hard,each would gain nothing.If only one party bargains hard the accommodating party gets a profit of $1 million while the bargaining party gets a $5 million,while if they both accommodate,they each get $3 million.
-Could either party do better?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)
Which of the following will improve your bargaining position when contracting with a supplier
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
For the following question
Consider a simultaneous move game between a union and a company.If both the parties bargain hard,each would gain nothing.If only one party bargains hard the accommodating party gets a profit of $1 million while the bargaining party gets a $5 million,while if they both accommodate,they each get $3 million.
-If the firm threatens a lockout (and the threat is credible),what is the union's best response?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)
Which of the following will improve your bargaining position with customers
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
Showing 1 - 20 of 82
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)