Exam 5: Criminal Procedure and the Police
Exam 1: Perspectives on Criminal Justice54 Questions
Exam 2: Defining and Analyzing Crime65 Questions
Exam 3: Criminal Law and the Criminal Justice Process66 Questions
Exam 4: Origins and Organization of Law Enforcement54 Questions
Exam 5: Criminal Procedure and the Police51 Questions
Exam 6: Issues in Law Enforcement and Police Behavior56 Questions
Exam 7: Origins and Organization of the Courts57 Questions
Exam 8: Trial Defense and Prosecution52 Questions
Exam 9: Trials and Sentencing55 Questions
Exam 10: Origins and Organization of Jails and Prisons57 Questions
Exam 11: Probation, Community Corrections, and Reentry57 Questions
Exam 12: Justice and Punishment in the Twenty-First Century52 Questions
Exam 13: Crime and Justice in the Twenty-First Century: White-Collar Crime, Organized Crime, and Terrorism55 Questions
Exam 14: Juvenile Justice53 Questions
Exam 15: Comparative Criminal Justice52 Questions
Select questions type
After an arrest and search have been carried out,the police have the authority to interrogate the arrested person.Interrogations are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution,but the limits of official interrogations are implied in the __________ Amendment.
(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(39)
What is the difference between a 'search' and a 'seizure'? How are they connected?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(31)
__________ are limited to a search for weapons that may pose an immediate threat to the officer's safety.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(37)
The case that established the legal authority and limits for a "stop and frisk" was __________.The case involved a Cleveland police officer who had been a plainclothes detective for thirty-five years and had patrolled a certain section of the downtown area for shoplifters and pickpockets for nearly thirty years.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)
The 'Miranda warning' is a five-point warning derived from the case of Miranda v.Arizona.Its purpose is to provide fair notice to crime suspects of their basic constitutional rights.
(True/False)
5.0/5
(49)
The landmark case that applied the provisions of the Fourth Amendment to searches was decided in __________.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(42)
A __________is an exploratory inspection of a person or property based on probable cause of law violation.
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(34)
A situation in which a police officer has good reason to believe that criminal activity may be occurring is called a(n)__________.This permits a brief investigative inquiry of the suspect.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
A 'seizure' refers to the confiscation of property occurring when there is some meaningful interference with the individual's possession of property.
(True/False)
4.9/5
(43)
Law enforcement officials initially criticized Miranda v.Arizona for limiting their ability to obtain evidence through interrogation.Many believed that officers would no longer be able to conduct interrogations of suspects without lawyers present,and that suspects who understood that they had the right to remain silent would always invoke this right and refuse to talk to the police.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)
The 'exclusionary rule' holds that illegally seized evidence must be excluded from trials.Searches conducted without probable cause (or without a warrant where one is required)are illegal.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(37)
The 'public safety exception' is a rule stating that evidence seized with a defective warrant,not based on probable cause,is admissible in court if the police acted in good faith in presenting the evidence and the error was made by the judge.
(True/False)
4.8/5
(42)
The term ____________ refers to the confiscation of property occurring when there is some meaningful interference with the individual's possession of property.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)
The 'good faith exception' means that police may omit the Miranda warning prior to questioning a suspect when public safety is jeopardized.
(True/False)
5.0/5
(31)
The right of police to search without a warrant items that are in "plain view" is another well established exception to the warrant requirement.This exception was explained in the Supreme Court's 1971 decision in Coolidge v.New Hampshire.The Court specified the following condition(s)for a plain view search:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(42)
__________ play a central role in criminal procedure because they are the gatekeepers of the criminal justice system.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)
The __________ to the Constitution includes protection against self-incrimination.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(32)
A __________ is a patting down of the outer clothing of a suspect based on reasonable suspicion,designed to protect a police officer from attack with a weapon while an inquiry is made.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(38)
A __________ is an exploratory inspection of a person or property based on probable cause of law violation.
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)
Showing 21 - 40 of 51
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)