Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statements Intra-Entity Asset Transactions

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Webb Co. acquired 100% of Rand Inc. on January 5, 2013. During 2013, Webb sold goods to Rand for $2,400,000 that cost Webb $1,800,000. Rand still owned 40% of the goods at the end of the year. Cost of goods sold was $10,800,000 for Webb and $6,400,000 for Rand. What was consolidated cost of goods sold?

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
Verified

B

Pot Co. holds 90% of the common stock of Skillet Co. During 2013, Pot reported sales of $1,120,000 and cost of goods sold of $840,000. For this same period, Skillet had sales of $420,000 and cost of goods sold of $252,000. Included in the amounts for Skillet's sales were Skillet's sales of merchandise to Pot for $140,000. There were no sales from Pot to Skillet. Intra-entity sales had the same markup as sales to outsiders. Pot still had 40% of the intra-entity sales as inventory at the end of 2013. What are consolidated sales and cost of goods sold for 2013?

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Correct Answer:
Verified

D

Gibson Corp. owned a 90% interest in Sparis Co. Sparis frequently made sales of inventory to Gibson. The sales, which include a markup over cost of 25%, were $420,000 in 2012 and $500,000 in 2013. At the end of each year, Gibson still owned 30% of the goods. Net income for Sparis was $912,000 during 2013. What was the non-controlling interest's share of Sparis' net income for 2013?

Free
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)
Correct Answer:
Verified

C

Walsh Company sells inventory to its subsidiary, Fisher Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Walsh uses the equity method to account for its investment in Fisher. In the consolidation worksheet for 2013, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2012 intra-entity sales?

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(26)

Stiller Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Leo Company, purchased land from Leo on March 1, 2012, for $75,000. The land originally cost Leo $60,000. Stiller reported net income of $125,000 and $140,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. Leo uses the equity method to account for its investment. Compute the gain or loss on the intra-entity sale of land.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)

Patti Company owns 80% of the common stock of Shannon, Inc. In the current year, Patti reports sales of $10,000,000 and cost of goods sold of $7,500,000. For the same period, Shannon has sales of $200,000 and cost of goods sold of $160,000. During the year, Patti sold merchandise to Shannon for $60,000 at a price based on the normal markup. At the end of the year, Shannon still possesses 30 percent of this inventory. Compute consolidated cost of goods sold.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)

Virginia Corp. owned all of the voting common stock of Stateside Co. Both companies use the perpetual inventory method, and Virginia decided to use the partial equity method to account for this investment. During 2012, Virginia made cash sales of $400,000 to Stateside. The gross profit rate was 30% of the selling price. By the end of 2012, Stateside had sold 75% of the goods to outside parties for $420,000 cash. Prepare journal entries for Virginia and Stateside to record the sales/purchases during 2012.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(42)

Dithers Inc. acquired all of the common stock of Bumstead Corp. on January 1, 2013. During 2013, Bumstead sold land to Dithers at a gain. No consolidation entry for the sale of the land was made at the end of 2013. What errors will this omission cause in the consolidated financial statements?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(39)

Stark Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Parker, Inc. sold land to Parker on May 1, 2012, for $80,000. The land originally cost Stark $85,000. Stark reported net income of $200,000, $180,000, and $220,000 for 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively. Parker sold the land purchased from Stark in 2012 for $92,000 in 2014. Compute income from Stark reported on Parker's books for 2013.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2012. In the consolidation worksheet for 2013, assuming Carter uses the initial value method of accounting for its investment in Strickland, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2012 intra-entity sales?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)

On January 1, 2013, Musial Corp. sold equipment to Matin Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary) for $168,000 in cash. The equipment originally cost $140,000 but had a book value of only $98,000 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense was calculated using the straight-line method. Musial earned $308,000 in net income in 2013 (not including any investment income) while Matin reported $126,000. Assume there is no amortization related to the original investment. Prepare a schedule of consolidated net income and the share to controlling and non-controlling interests for 2013, assuming that Musial owned only 90% of Matin and the equipment transfer had been upstream

(Essay)
4.9/5
(36)

Pepe, Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company on January 1, 2012. On that date Devin sold equipment to Pepe for $45,000. The equipment had a cost of $120,000 and accumulated depreciation of $66,000 with a remaining life of 9 years. Devin reported net income of $300,000 and $325,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. Pepe uses the equity method to account for its investment in Devin. What is the gain or loss on equipment reported by Devin for 2012?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)

On January 1, 2013, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2013, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows: On January 1, 2013, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2013, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows:   During 2013, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31, 2013. What is the total of consolidated revenues? During 2013, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31, 2013. What is the total of consolidated revenues?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(42)

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2012. Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2012.   Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends.   Compute the non-controlling interest in Gargiulo's net income for 2013. Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2012.   Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends.   Compute the non-controlling interest in Gargiulo's net income for 2013. Compute the non-controlling interest in Gargiulo's net income for 2013.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)

Several years ago Polar Inc. acquired an 80% interest in Icecap Co. The book values of Icecap's asset and liability accounts at that time were considered to be equal to their fair values. Polar's acquisition value corresponded to the underlying book value of Icecap so that no allocations or goodwill resulted from the transaction. The following selected account balances were from the individual financial records of these two companies as of December 31, 2013: Several years ago Polar Inc. acquired an 80% interest in Icecap Co. The book values of Icecap's asset and liability accounts at that time were considered to be equal to their fair values. Polar's acquisition value corresponded to the underlying book value of Icecap so that no allocations or goodwill resulted from the transaction. The following selected account balances were from the individual financial records of these two companies as of December 31, 2013:    Assume that Icecap sold inventory to Polar at a markup equal to 25% of cost. Intra-entity transfers were $70,000 in 2012 and $112,000 in 2013. Of this inventory, $29,000 of the 2012 transfers were retained and then sold by Polar in 2013, whereas $49,000 of the 2013 transfers were held until 2014. Required: For the consolidated financial statements for 2013, determine the balances that would appear for the following accounts: (1) Cost of Goods Sold, (2) Inventory, and (3) Non-controlling Interest in Subsidiary's Net Income. Assume that Icecap sold inventory to Polar at a markup equal to 25% of cost. Intra-entity transfers were $70,000 in 2012 and $112,000 in 2013. Of this inventory, $29,000 of the 2012 transfers were retained and then sold by Polar in 2013, whereas $49,000 of the 2013 transfers were held until 2014. Required: For the consolidated financial statements for 2013, determine the balances that would appear for the following accounts: (1) Cost of Goods Sold, (2) Inventory, and (3) Non-controlling Interest in Subsidiary's Net Income.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(37)

Justings Co. owned 80% of Evana Corp. During 2013, Justings sold to Evana land with a book value of $48,000. The selling price was $70,000. In its accounting records, Justings should

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2012. On January 1, 2012, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2012 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2012. On January 1, 2012, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2012 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends:   Compute the gain on transfer of equipment reported by Wilson for 2012. Compute the gain on transfer of equipment reported by Wilson for 2012.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(29)

Stark Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Parker, Inc. sold land to Parker on May 1, 2012, for $80,000. The land originally cost Stark $85,000. Stark reported net income of $200,000, $180,000, and $220,000 for 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively. Parker sold the land purchased from Stark in 2012 for $92,000 in 2014. Compute income from Stark reported on Parker's books for 2012.

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(39)

Virginia Corp. owned all of the voting common stock of Stateside Co. Both companies use the perpetual inventory method, and Virginia decided to use the partial equity method to account for this investment. During 2012, Virginia made cash sales of $400,000 to Stateside. The gross profit rate was 30% of the selling price. By the end of 2012, Stateside had sold 75% of the goods to outside parties for $420,000 cash. Prepare any 2013 consolidation worksheet entries that would be required regarding the 2012 inventory transfer.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(40)

Stiller Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Leo Company, purchased land from Leo on March 1, 2012, for $75,000. The land originally cost Leo $60,000. Stiller reported net income of $125,000 and $140,000 for 2012 and 2013, respectively. Leo uses the equity method to account for its investment. On a consolidation worksheet, having used the equity method, what adjustment would be made for 2013 regarding the land transfer?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
Showing 1 - 20 of 127
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)