Question 1

The Court's decision in the case of Morrow v. Maryland (1982) was:

Accepted Answer

A)  a defendant found to be malingering may be given a longer sentence. 
B)  severe memory loss does not mean that a defendant should be ruled incompetent. 
C)  a defendant with a serious mental illness must be given multiple evaluations. 
D)  medications can be administered to a defendant against his will if he is malingering. 
A)  a defendant found to be malingering may be given a longer sentence. 
B)  severe memory loss does not mean that a defendant should be ruled incompetent. 
C)  a defendant with a serious mental illness must be given multiple evaluations. 
D)  medications can be administered to a defendant against his will if he is malingering. B

Question 2

In the case of Indiana v. Edwards (2008), the Supreme Court held that:

Accepted Answer

A)  incompetent defendants could not be held without trial more than a reasonable amount of time. 
B)  a defendant could be medicated against his or her will without a court hearing. 
C)  there is a higher standard for a mentally ill individual to waive counsel than the CST standard. 
D)  the presence of mental disorder or intellectual disability is equated with incompetence. 
A)  incompetent defendants could not be held without trial more than a reasonable amount of time. 
B)  a defendant could be medicated against his or her will without a court hearing. 
C)  there is a higher standard for a mentally ill individual to waive counsel than the CST standard. 
D)  the presence of mental disorder or intellectual disability is equated with incompetence. C

Question 3

Competency to stand trial refers to the psychological state of the defendant:

Accepted Answer

A)  at the time of the crime. 
B)  during pre-trial proceedings. 
C)  at the time of sentencing. 
D)  at the time of trial. 
A)  at the time of the crime. 
B)  during pre-trial proceedings. 
C)  at the time of sentencing. 
D)  at the time of trial. D

Question 4

According to the information presented in Chapter 8, which of the following is FALSE regarding competency to stand trial?

Accepted Answer

A)  A majority of incompetent defendants are eventually restored to competency. 
B)  Judges agree with the decisions of competence evaluators most of the time. 
C)  A majority of individuals referred for a competence evaluation are found incompetent. 
D)  Defendants can be medicated against their will in order to restore competence. 
A)  A majority of incompetent defendants are eventually restored to competency. 
B)  Judges agree with the decisions of competence evaluators most of the time. 
C)  A majority of individuals referred for a competence evaluation are found incompetent. 
D)  Defendants can be medicated against their will in order to restore competence.

Question 5

CST refers to several types of functions a defendant should be able to perform. Which of the following is NOT one of these functions?

Accepted Answer

A)  Understanding the charges against you. 
B)  Acting appropriately during the trial. 
C)  Ability to trust your prosecutor. 
D)  Ability to trust and communicate with your defense counsel. 
A)  Understanding the charges against you. 
B)  Acting appropriately during the trial. 
C)  Ability to trust your prosecutor. 
D)  Ability to trust and communicate with your defense counsel.

Question 6

Which one of the following forensic assessment instruments (FAIs) is considered to be a gold standard for determining competency to stand trial?

Accepted Answer

A)  The Competency Screening Test. 
B)  The Fitness Interview Test-Revised. 
C)  The MacArthur Judgment Evaluation Tool. 
D)  No test or combination of tests can assess CST with certainty. 
A)  The Competency Screening Test. 
B)  The Fitness Interview Test-Revised. 
C)  The MacArthur Judgment Evaluation Tool. 
D)  No test or combination of tests can assess CST with certainty.

Question 7

In the case of _____, the Supreme Court held that separate psychological evaluations of competency to waive one's rights to counsel or plead guilty are not required once a defendant has been found competent to stand trial.

Accepted Answer

A)  Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 
B)  United States v. Charters (1988) 
C)  Dusky v. United States (1960) 
D)  Godinez v. Moran (1993) 
A)  Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 
B)  United States v. Charters (1988) 
C)  Dusky v. United States (1960) 
D)  Godinez v. Moran (1993)

Question 8

Unlike what most people think, malingering means that all of the following is likely to happen to the criminal defendant who is faking incompetency EXCEPT:

Accepted Answer

A)  being set free. 
B)  getting hospitalized in a secure facility. 
C)  his or her competency attempted to be restored. 
D)  if serious, charges can be refiled later, when competency is regained. 
A)  being set free. 
B)  getting hospitalized in a secure facility. 
C)  his or her competency attempted to be restored. 
D)  if serious, charges can be refiled later, when competency is regained.

Question 9

Most states limit the period of confinement for defendants found to be incompetent to somewhere between:

Accepted Answer

A)  4 and 18 months. 
B)  2 and 3 years. 
C)  30 and 90 days. 
D)  40% to 50% of the sentence if the defendant were to be convicted. 
A)  4 and 18 months. 
B)  2 and 3 years. 
C)  30 and 90 days. 
D)  40% to 50% of the sentence if the defendant were to be convicted.

Question 10

According to the textbook, all of the following are common mental health problems diagnosed in defendants found to be incompetent to stand trial EXCEPT:

Accepted Answer

A)  obsessive-compulsive disorder. 
B)  bipolar disorder. 
C)  schizophrenia. 
D)  intellectual disability. 
A)  obsessive-compulsive disorder. 
B)  bipolar disorder. 
C)  schizophrenia. 
D)  intellectual disability.

Question 11

Some forensic psychologists argue that all of the following conditions should trigger an automatic competency evaluation for juveniles EXCEPT:

Accepted Answer

A)  history of developmental disability. 
B)  family history of mental illness. 
C)  low or "borderline" intelligence. 
D)  age 12 or younger. 
A)  history of developmental disability. 
B)  family history of mental illness. 
C)  low or "borderline" intelligence. 
D)  age 12 or younger.

Question 12

The modern conception of competency to stand trial was defined by the Supreme Court in the case of:

Accepted Answer

A)  Miranda v. Arizona (1966). 
B)  United States v. Charters (1988). 
C)  Dusky v. United States (1960). 
D)  Godinez v. Moran (1993). 
A)  Miranda v. Arizona (1966). 
B)  United States v. Charters (1988). 
C)  Dusky v. United States (1960). 
D)  Godinez v. Moran (1993).

Question 13

Regarding defendants judged to be incompetent to stand trial, which of the following is FALSE?

Accepted Answer

A)  They tend to be charged with more serious crimes. 
B)  They have a history of drug abuse. 
C)  They show symptoms of current mental illness. 
D)  They have a history of mental health treatment. 
A)  They tend to be charged with more serious crimes. 
B)  They have a history of drug abuse. 
C)  They show symptoms of current mental illness. 
D)  They have a history of mental health treatment.

Question 14

Which of the following cases involved the issue of a defendant being forcibly medicated who was deemed not to be a danger to himself or others?

Accepted Answer

A)  Jackson v. Indiana (1972). 
B)  Washington v. Harper (1990). 
C)  Sell v. United States (2003). 
D)  Ford v. Wainwright (1986). 
A)  Jackson v. Indiana (1972). 
B)  Washington v. Harper (1990). 
C)  Sell v. United States (2003). 
D)  Ford v. Wainwright (1986).

Question 15

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court limit the period of confinement to the time necessary to determine if the defendant could be returned to competence in the foreseeable future?

Accepted Answer

A)  Jackson v. Indiana (1972). 
B)  Washington v. Harper (1990). 
C)  Sell v. United States (2003). 
D)  Ford v. Wainwright (1986). 
A)  Jackson v. Indiana (1972). 
B)  Washington v. Harper (1990). 
C)  Sell v. United States (2003). 
D)  Ford v. Wainwright (1986).

Exam 8: Section 3: Competency to Stand Trial

The Court's decision in the case of Morrow v. Maryland (1982) was:

In the case of Indiana v. Edwards (2008), the Supreme Court held that:

Competency to stand trial refers to the psychological state of the defendant:

According to the information presented in Chapter 8, which of the following is FALSE regarding competency to stand trial?

CST refers to several types of functions a defendant should be able to perform. Which of the following is NOT one of these functions?

Which one of the following forensic assessment instruments (FAIs) is considered to be a gold standard for determining competency to stand trial?

In the case of _____, the Supreme Court held that separate psychological evaluations of competency to waive one's rights to counsel or plead guilty are not required once a defendant has been found competent to stand trial.

Unlike what most people think, malingering means that all of the following is likely to happen to the criminal defendant who is faking incompetency EXCEPT:

Most states limit the period of confinement for defendants found to be incompetent to somewhere between:

According to the textbook, all of the following are common mental health problems diagnosed in defendants found to be incompetent to stand trial EXCEPT:

Some forensic psychologists argue that all of the following conditions should trigger an automatic competency evaluation for juveniles EXCEPT:

The modern conception of competency to stand trial was defined by the Supreme Court in the case of:

Regarding defendants judged to be incompetent to stand trial, which of the following is FALSE?

Which of the following cases involved the issue of a defendant being forcibly medicated who was deemed not to be a danger to himself or others?

In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court limit the period of confinement to the time necessary to determine if the defendant could be returned to competence in the foreseeable future?

Section 1: Psychology and Law: a Cautious Alliance

Section 2: Psychology and Law: a Cautious Alliance

Section 3: Psychology and Law: a Cautious Alliance

Section 1: Interrogations and Confessions

Section 2: Interrogations and Confessions

Section 3: Interrogations and Confessions

Section 1: Lie Detection

Section 2: Lie Detection

Section 3: Lie Detection

Section 1: The Psychology of Forensic Identification: Dna, Fingerprints, and Physical Trace Evidence

Section 2: The Psychology of Forensic Identification: Dna, Fingerprints, and Physical Trace Evidence

Section 3: The Psychology of Forensic Identification: Dna, Fingerprints, and Physical Trace Evidence

Section 1: Criminal Profiling and Psychological Autopsies

Section 2: Criminal Profiling and Psychological Autopsies

Section 3: Criminal Profiling and Psychological Autopsies

Section 1: Child Sexual Abuse: Interviewing Children and the Recovered Memories of Adults

Section 2: Child Sexual Abuse: Interviewing Children and the Recovered Memories of Adults

Section 3: Child Sexual Abuse: Interviewing Children and the Recovered Memories of Adults

Section 1: Eyewitness Identification and Testimony

Section 2: Eyewitness Identification and Testimony

Section 3: Eyewitness Identification and Testimony

Section 1: Competency to Stand Trial

Section 2: Competency to Stand Trial

Section 1: Jury Selection and Trial Procedure

Section 2: Jury Selection and Trial Procedure

Section 3: Jury Selection and Trial Procedure

Section 1: The Insanity Defense

Section 2: The Insanity Defense

Section 3: The Insanity Defense

Section 1: Battered Woman Syndrome, Rape Trauma Syndrome, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Section 2: Battered Woman Syndrome, Rape Trauma Syndrome, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Section 3: Battered Woman Syndrome, Rape Trauma Syndrome, and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Section 1: Juries and Judges As Decision Makers

Section 2: Juries and Judges As Decision Makers

Section 3 Juries and Judges As Decision Makers

Section 1: Child Custody Disputes

Section 2: Child Custody Disputes

Section 3: Child Custody Disputes

Section 1: Workplace Law: Harassment, Discrimination, and Fairness

Section 2: Workplace Law: Harassment, Discrimination, and Fairness

Section 3: Workplace Law: Harassment, Discrimination, and Fairness

Section 1: Predicting Violent Behavior: the Psychology of Risk Assessment

Section 2: Predicting Violent Behavior: the Psychology of Risk Assessment

Section 3: Predicting Violent Behavior: the Psychology of Risk Assessment

Section 1: Corrections: Sentencing, Imprisonment, and Alternatives

Section 2: Corrections: Sentencing, Imprisonment, and Alternatives

Section 3: Corrections: Sentencing, Imprisonment, and Alternatives

Section 1: The Death Penalty

Section 2: The Death Penalty

Section 3: The Death Penalty

Filters