Exam 7: Decision Making

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Social loafing and free riding are both phenomena that occur within groups when individuals contribute less effort to a collective task than they would if working alone. Despite their similarities, there are distinct differences between the two concepts:

1. Definition:
- Social Loafing: This refers to the tendency of individuals to put forth less effort when working in a group compared to when they work alone. The reduction in effort can be due to the perception that one's individual contribution is less noticeable or that others will pick up the slack.
- Free Rider: A free rider is someone who benefits from resources, goods, or services without paying for the cost of the benefit. In a group setting, a free rider deliberately avoids contributing to the group's effort or resources but still benefits from the group's successes or outcomes.

2. Intentionality:
- Social loafing can be an unconscious behavior that results from the dynamics of group work. Individuals may not even realize they are contributing less effort.
- Free riding is often a conscious decision where an individual chooses not to contribute, knowing that they can still reap the rewards without putting in the work.

3. Group Size:
- Social Loafing: The likelihood of social loafing increases with the size of the group. As groups become larger, individual contributions become less noticeable, and people may feel less accountable for the group's output.
- Free Rider: The size of the group can also affect free riding, but it is more related to the ability to conceal one's lack of contribution. In smaller groups, it's harder to be a free rider because individual contributions are more visible.

4. Context:
- Social Loafing: This phenomenon is often discussed in the context of workplace teams, academic group projects, and sports teams where the collective effort is required to achieve a goal.
- Free Rider: Free riding is a term that originates from economics and is often used in the context of public goods and services, such as public transportation, national defense, or public broadcasting.

5. Impact on Group Dynamics:
- Social Loafing: Social loafing can lead to frustration among group members, decreased group cohesion, and overall lower group productivity.
- Free Rider: Free riding can cause resentment among those who contribute, as they feel they are being taken advantage of by the non-contributors. It can also lead to under-provision of resources or goods if too many individuals choose not to contribute.

In summary, while both social loafing and free riding involve reduced individual effort in a group context, social loafing is often an unconscious byproduct of group dynamics, whereas free riding is a deliberate choice to benefit from others' efforts without contributing. Both behaviors can negatively impact group performance and morale, but they stem from different motivations and have different implications for group work and the provision of collective goods.

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Groups usually make better decisions than individuals for several reasons:

1. Diverse Perspectives: Groups are composed of individuals with different backgrounds, experiences, and areas of expertise. This diversity can lead to a wider range of perspectives and ideas, allowing the group to consider more aspects of a problem than an individual might on their own.

2. More Information: Each member of a group brings their own knowledge and information to the table. When pooled together, the group has access to a larger body of information than any single individual, which can lead to more informed decision-making.

3. Error Checking: In a group setting, members can critique and question each other's ideas and assumptions. This collaborative scrutiny helps to identify and correct errors, biases, or oversights that an individual might miss.

4. Creativity and Innovation: The interaction within a group can foster creativity and lead to the generation of new ideas and solutions. Brainstorming and collaborative discussions can spark thoughts that individuals might not have come up with on their own.

5. Risk Sharing: Groups can diffuse the responsibility for a decision, which may encourage individuals to propose and consider riskier or more innovative options that they might avoid if making the decision alone.

6. Improved Learning: Group discussions can be educational as members explain their viewpoints and reasoning to others. This exchange of ideas can help individuals learn from each other and improve their own understanding of the issues at hand.

7. Greater Commitment: When group members participate in the decision-making process, they are more likely to feel a sense of ownership and commitment to the decisions and outcomes. This can lead to better implementation and follow-through.

8. Synergy: The collaborative effort of a group can lead to a synergy where the collective abilities and energies of the group members exceed the sum of their individual contributions. This can result in more effective and efficient decision-making.

However, it's important to note that groups do not always make better decisions than individuals. Group dynamics can sometimes lead to problems such as groupthink, where the desire for harmony or conformity results in irrational or dysfunctional decision-making. Effective group decision-making typically requires good leadership, clear communication, and structured processes to ensure that the benefits of collective decision-making are realized while minimizing potential drawbacks.