Exam 8: Controversy and Creativity
Explain the differences between open-minded and close-minded groups.
Open-minded and close-minded groups differ in their attitudes and approaches to new ideas, perspectives, and information.
Open-minded groups are receptive to new ideas and are willing to consider different viewpoints. They are curious, adaptable, and open to change. They are also more likely to engage in constructive dialogue and collaboration with others, even if they have differing opinions. Open-minded groups are generally more inclusive and tolerant of diversity, and they are more likely to embrace innovation and progress.
On the other hand, close-minded groups are resistant to new ideas and are often dismissive of perspectives that differ from their own. They tend to be rigid in their thinking, unwilling to consider alternative viewpoints, and are often defensive when confronted with new information. Close-minded groups may also be more prone to prejudice, discrimination, and intolerance towards those who are different from them.
Overall, the main difference between open-minded and close-minded groups lies in their willingness to embrace new ideas and perspectives. Open-minded groups are more open to learning and growth, while close-minded groups are more resistant to change and tend to cling to their existing beliefs and attitudes.
Why is individual decision-making lacking?
Individual decision-making can be lacking for a variety of reasons, which can be broadly categorized into psychological, social, informational, and structural factors. Here's a detailed look at each of these categories:
1. Psychological Factors:
- Cognitive Limitations: Humans have limited cognitive resources, which can lead to difficulties in processing all the relevant information needed to make a decision.
- Heuristics and Biases: People often rely on mental shortcuts or heuristics, which can lead to systematic biases and errors in judgment.
- Emotions: Emotional states can heavily influence decision-making, sometimes leading to impulsive or irrational choices.
- Overconfidence: Individuals may overestimate their knowledge or abilities, leading to poor decisions.
- Risk Aversion or Seeking: Depending on the individual's personality, they might either avoid taking necessary risks or engage in overly risky behavior without adequate consideration.
2. Social Factors:
- Social Influence: Decisions can be swayed by the opinions, behaviors, or expectations of others, leading to conformity or peer pressure.
- Cultural Norms: Cultural expectations can limit the range of acceptable choices or dictate certain decisions.
- Groupthink: In group settings, the desire for harmony or conformity can result in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome.
3. Informational Factors:
- Information Overload: The vast amount of information available can be overwhelming, making it difficult to focus on what is most relevant.
- Lack of Information: Conversely, a lack of necessary information can lead to uninformed decisions.
- Misinformation: False or misleading information can lead to incorrect conclusions and poor decision-making.
4. Structural Factors:
- Time Constraints: Limited time can force individuals to make quick decisions without fully considering all options.
- Resource Limitations: Insufficient resources (financial, human, technological) can constrain the choices available to an individual.
- Institutional Constraints: Organizational rules, regulations, and structures can limit the scope of decision-making or impose certain directions.
5. Lack of Experience or Expertise:
- Individuals may lack the necessary experience or specialized knowledge to make informed decisions in certain areas.
6. Motivational Factors:
- Lack of Incentives: Without proper motivation or incentives, individuals may not invest the effort required to make good decisions.
- Apathy: A general lack of interest or concern about the outcome can lead to a lack of effort in the decision-making process.
Understanding these factors can help in identifying why individual decision-making might be lacking in a given context and can guide efforts to improve decision-making processes, such as through education, better information management, and the design of supportive social and organizational structures.
When group members replace old beliefs with new ones, it is the
A
In group discussions, if there is a margin of support for one alternative, other ideas have little chance of being accepted.
Minority opinions are most persuasive when they are unwilling to compromise.
Presenting a position and providing reasons why others should adopt it is
What are the effects of a competitive context on those involved in controversy?
Individuals who hold strong beliefs about an issue are apt to
Advocating a position and defending it against refutation require
Why is it important to confirm the other's competence when disagreeing with them?
To make sure the group engages in productive controversy, it is most important that they
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)