Chat with AIExam 7: Qualitative and Quantitative Measurement
How do you improve measurement reliability? Discuss three methods of improving measurement reliability.
(29) 
Answered by Examlex AI CopilotImproving measurement reliability is crucial for obtaining accurate and consistent results in any research or data collection process. There are several methods that can be employed to enhance measurement reliability. Three key methods include:
1. Standardization of Measurement Procedures: Standardizing measurement procedures involves ensuring that all measurements are taken in a consistent and uniform manner. This can be achieved by providing clear and detailed instructions to the individuals responsible for taking measurements, as well as providing training and regular supervision to ensure that measurements are being taken accurately and consistently. Standardization helps to minimize errors and variations in measurement techniques, thereby improving reliability.
2. Use of Multiple Measures: Employing multiple measures involves using more than one method or instrument to collect data on the same variable. This approach allows for cross-validation of results and helps to reduce the impact of measurement errors or biases associated with any single measure. By using multiple measures, researchers can obtain a more comprehensive and reliable understanding of the variable being measured.
3. Test-Retest Reliability: Test-retest reliability involves conducting the same measurement on the same group of individuals at two different time points and then comparing the results to assess the consistency of the measurements over time. This method helps to identify and account for any sources of variability or instability in the measurement process, such as environmental factors or individual differences. By assessing the stability of measurements over time, researchers can determine the extent to which their measurements are reliable and make adjustments as needed.
In conclusion, improving measurement reliability is essential for ensuring the accuracy and validity of research findings. By standardizing measurement procedures, using multiple measures, and assessing test-retest reliability, researchers can enhance the reliability of their measurements and produce more robust and trustworthy results.
How do qualitative and quantitative ideas about validity differ?
(34) Answered by Examlex AI CopilotQualitative and quantitative ideas about validity differ in their approach to assessing the accuracy and truthfulness of research findings.
Qualitative validity focuses on the credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability of the research. Credibility refers to the believability of the findings, transferability refers to the extent to which the findings can be applied to other contexts, dependability refers to the consistency and stability of the findings over time, and confirmability refers to the objectivity and neutrality of the research process. Qualitative validity is often assessed through techniques such as member checking, peer debriefing, and prolonged engagement in the field.
On the other hand, quantitative validity focuses on the internal validity, external validity, construct validity, and statistical conclusion validity of the research. Internal validity refers to the extent to which the research design and methods accurately measure the variables of interest, external validity refers to the generalizability of the findings to other populations or settings, construct validity refers to the accuracy of the operationalization of the variables, and statistical conclusion validity refers to the appropriateness of the statistical analyses and conclusions drawn from the data. Quantitative validity is often assessed through techniques such as randomization, control groups, and statistical tests for significance.
In summary, qualitative validity focuses on the trustworthiness and rigor of the research process, while quantitative validity focuses on the accuracy and generalizability of the research findings. Both approaches are important for ensuring the validity of research findings, and researchers often use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to strengthen the validity of their work.
Janice wanted to test the validity of a new measure of intelligence. She found that those who scored low on OLD tests of intelligence usually scored low on her NEW test; those who scored very high on OLD tests usually scored HIGH on the new test. What type of validity was Janice concerned with?
(43) 
VerifiedD
Why would Professor Lopez conduct a "subpopulation analysis"?
(26) What level of measurement is being used in the statement: "A fox terrier is smaller than a Russian wolfhound, but bigger than a chinchilla"?
(36) How does a researcher use the conceptual definition of a construct in operationalization and conceptualization?
(28) What are the differences between face, content, and criterion validly? How does each form of validity add to a measure's overall measurement validity?
(29) The process of an individual taking a systematic conceptual definition and creating a measurement tool to represent this conceptual definition is
(38) Refer to the following paragraph to answer the questions below.
Maria Valencia developed a new test to measure intelligence or I.Q. She claimed that using her test, someone with an I.Q. of 180 would be considered twice as intelligent as someone with an I.Q. of 90. Someone with a score of 0, had absolutely no intelligence. In order to see how good it was, she tested two groups of students with her new test during the first week of the semester. One group scored low on existing I.Q. tests. The other scored very high. She found that those who scored low on old tests usually scored low on her new test, while those who scored very high on old tests usually scored high on the new test. In addition, she had the group of people who took the new test retake it at the midterm and again at the end of the semester. She found that a person's I.Q. score did not change across the three times it was measured during the semester.
-By comparing it with an old test, she has shown the new measure to have
(31) Terance "the tower" Thomas weighed himself three times this morning. At 7:00 a.m. "the tower" weighed 295 pounds, at 7:02 he weighed 200 pounds, and finally at 7:04 he weighed 499 pounds. The scale "the tower" is using has issues of
(29) List three types of measurement reliability. What is the difference between these three types of reliability? How does each form of reliability contribute to the overall measurement reliability?
(32) Most social scientists do not accept the color of a person's hair as a measure of her or his intelligence because it lacks
(34) How can a measure have unidimensionality but also use multiple indicators which capture all parts of the content of a construct?
(27) Identify the statement that characterizes equivalence reliability.
(37) Which sequence illustrates the progression of quantitative measurement steps?
(39) Refer to the following paragraph to answer the questions below.
Maria Valencia developed a new test to measure intelligence or I.Q. She claimed that using her test, someone with an I.Q. of 180 would be considered twice as intelligent as someone with an I.Q. of 90. Someone with a score of 0, had absolutely no intelligence. In order to see how good it was, she tested two groups of students with her new test during the first week of the semester. One group scored low on existing I.Q. tests. The other scored very high. She found that those who scored low on old tests usually scored low on her new test, while those who scored very high on old tests usually scored high on the new test. In addition, she had the group of people who took the new test retake it at the midterm and again at the end of the semester. She found that a person's I.Q. score did not change across the three times it was measured during the semester.
-Dr. Horse developed a measure of "quality of city life." He included measures of many factors, including: tax rate, quality of school system, cultural and recreational opportunities, pollution, traffic congestion, crime rate, and health care availability for 100 U.S. cities to get a score for each. Dr. Horse created an)
(37) Professor Su Mae Lee created a measure student efficacy. He identified many subjective dimensions and labeled each with polar extremes. The extremes referred to general evaluative adverbs and adjectives. Subjects marked answers on one of nine spaces between the two extremes. Dr. Lee used a
(29) Refer to the following paragraph to answer the questions below.
Maria Valencia developed a new test to measure intelligence or I.Q. She claimed that using her test, someone with an I.Q. of 180 would be considered twice as intelligent as someone with an I.Q. of 90. Someone with a score of 0, had absolutely no intelligence. In order to see how good it was, she tested two groups of students with her new test during the first week of the semester. One group scored low on existing I.Q. tests. The other scored very high. She found that those who scored low on old tests usually scored low on her new test, while those who scored very high on old tests usually scored high on the new test. In addition, she had the group of people who took the new test retake it at the midterm and again at the end of the semester. She found that a person's I.Q. score did not change across the three times it was measured during the semester.
-What is the level of measurement of her new test?
(41) How do reliability and validity differ? How do they complement each other? Can a measure be reliable but invalid? Can a measure be unreliable but valid? How?
(38) Convergent validity and discriminant validity are both components of construct validity. What makes convergent and discriminant validity components of construct validity? What distinguishes the difference between convergent and discriminant validity?
(30) 
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)