Exam 22: Multifactor Models

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

In the Vasicek one factor model, the short rate determines the model. In the Vasicek two factor model, what rates drive the model?

Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(38)
Correct Answer:
Verified

In the two factor model it is the short rate and the long rate that determine the rest of the rate dynamics in the term structure.

Under the Vasicek model, what degree of correlation do different interest rates have?

Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(35)
Correct Answer:
Verified

Rates on the term structure are perfectly correlated in the Vasicek model.

When are multifactor models used?

Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(30)
Correct Answer:
Verified

When we want to allow independent variation in the level, slope and cur- vature components of the yield curve.

How is the multivariate Ito's lemma defined?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(43)

What are multifactor models?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(38)

What is the difference between using a model for finding arbitrage oppor- tunities and using a model for pricing derivatives and other securities?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(40)

Is the 2-factor Vasicek model an afine model?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(43)

Can a solution always be found in order to price a security as proposed by the Feynman-Kac formula?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(36)

Does the 2-factor Vasicek model fit the yield curve?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(31)

What peculiarity of a yield curve steepner makes the use of 2-factor models attractive?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(34)

What modi?cations should be included to Ito's lemma when we allow correlation between the two factors?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(31)

Show that, given: Show that, given:

(Essay)
4.9/5
(25)

What advantages does the 2-factor Vasicek have when fitting volatility?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(44)

In the 2-factor Hull-White model, what is the benefit of introducing θt (time dependent central tendency)?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(40)

Why is it considered that implied volatility of interest rate options has a "hump" shape?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(41)

Given that we now have two stochastic factors, when writing Ito's lemma as the following Given that we now have two stochastic factors, when writing Ito's lemma as the following   what are we implicitly assuming about them? what are we implicitly assuming about them?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(38)
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)