Exam 9: Group Facilitation

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The norming stage is the third phase of Bruce Tuckman's model of group development, which includes forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. During the norming stage, group members begin to resolve their differences, appreciate colleagues' strengths, and respect the authority of the group leader. The group develops a sense of cohesion and unity as members work towards the group's goals.

While the norming stage is characterized by the establishment of order and cohesion, conflicts can still arise. Here are some types of conflict that are likely to occur during the norming stage:

1. Role Conflicts: As roles become clearer, some members might feel that their talents are not being utilized effectively, or they may envy the roles of others. Disagreements over responsibilities and duties can occur if expectations are not clearly defined or understood.

2. Subgroup Dynamics: Even as the group is developing a sense of unity, cliques or subgroups may form within the team. These subgroups can have their own norms and relationships, which might conflict with those of the larger group.

3. Decision-Making Conflicts: As the group starts to make more decisions, there may be disagreements over the best course of action. Members may have different ideas about the direction the group should take or the methods for achieving its goals.

4. Interpersonal Conflicts: Although the storming stage is typically when interpersonal conflicts are most evident, they can still surface during norming. As members become more comfortable with each other, they may express lingering frustrations or disagreements that were not fully resolved earlier.

5. Conflict over Norms and Standards: The group is actively working to establish norms and standards during the norming stage. Conflicts can arise over what behaviors are acceptable and what performance standards should be set.

6. Authority and Leadership Conflicts: While the group may have accepted a leader or leadership structure, there can still be conflicts regarding the extent of the leader's authority or the leadership style. Some members might feel that the leader is too controlling or not directive enough.

7. Resource Conflicts: As the group starts to function more cohesively, competition for resources (time, money, equipment, etc.) can lead to conflicts, especially if resources are scarce or not evenly distributed.

To manage these conflicts effectively, it is important for the group to continue to communicate openly, establish clear roles and responsibilities, and develop effective conflict resolution strategies. The norming stage is an opportunity to solidify the group's foundation and prepare for the performing stage, where the focus shifts to achieving the group's objectives efficiently and effectively.

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

In a dialogue process and an identity-based process, the role of a facilitator can differ in several key ways. Here are three differences:

1. Focus on Communication vs. Focus on Personal Experience:
- In a dialogue process, the facilitator's role is often to encourage open and effective communication between participants. The facilitator helps to create a safe space where individuals can share perspectives and listen to each other with the goal of mutual understanding. The focus is on the exchange of ideas and viewpoints.
- In contrast, an identity-based process often centers on the personal experiences and identities of the participants. The facilitator in this context is more likely to guide discussions that explore how individual identities impact interactions and perceptions. The facilitator helps participants to reflect on their own identities and the way these identities intersect with systems of power and privilege.

2. Neutrality vs. Advocacy:
- Facilitators in dialogue processes are typically expected to remain neutral, not taking sides or promoting a particular point of view. Their role is to manage the process of dialogue, ensuring that all voices are heard and that the conversation remains respectful and productive.
- In identity-based processes, facilitators might adopt a more advocacy-oriented role, especially when dealing with issues of social justice and equity. They may need to actively support marginalized voices and ensure that the process addresses power imbalances. The facilitator might also help participants understand and challenge systemic biases that affect the group.

3. Process Orientation vs. Outcome Orientation:
- Dialogue facilitators are often process-oriented, focusing on the quality of the interaction and the journey of understanding among participants. They may not be driving towards a specific outcome or decision, but rather are invested in the process itself being transformative and inclusive.
- Identity-based facilitators may be more outcome-oriented, especially if the process is designed to address specific issues related to identity, such as discrimination or inequity. The facilitator might guide the group towards developing action plans or commitments to change, ensuring that the process leads to tangible outcomes that address the concerns related to identity.

In summary, while both roles involve managing group dynamics and supporting communication, the facilitator in a dialogue process tends to emphasize neutral, process-focused engagement, whereas the facilitator in an identity-based process may take a more active role in advocating for equity and guiding the group towards specific outcomes that address identity-related issues.