Chat with AIExam 15: Integrated Theories
Is integration a viable way to reduce the number of theories in criminology? Defend your position. What alternatives exist?
(37) 
Answered by Examlex AI CopilotIntegration can be a viable way to reduce the number of theories in criminology. By integrating various theories, researchers and practitioners can create a more comprehensive understanding of criminal behavior and develop more effective strategies for preventing and addressing crime. Integration allows for the synthesis of different perspectives and the identification of common themes and patterns, ultimately leading to a more cohesive and unified approach to understanding and addressing crime.
One alternative to integration is the continued proliferation of individual theories in criminology. However, this approach can lead to fragmentation and a lack of consensus within the field, making it difficult to develop cohesive and effective strategies for addressing crime. Another alternative is to focus solely on one or a few theories, which can limit the understanding of criminal behavior and overlook important contributing factors.
In conclusion, while integration may not be the only way to reduce the number of theories in criminology, it offers a promising approach to creating a more cohesive and comprehensive understanding of crime. By integrating various theories, researchers and practitioners can develop a more unified and effective approach to addressing crime.
An argument in favor of integration suggests that falsification failed to:
(37) 
VerifiedB
Under Colvin's coercion theory, coercion is said to occur when one is compelled to act in a certain way through direct force or intimidation from others through the pressure of impersonal economic or social forces.
(48) VerifiedTrue
Integrated theories pit two or more theories against each other in an empirical test for accuracy.
(30) Why does theory falsification require an "all or nothing" approach?
(42) What are the six types of deviance according to Tittle's control balance theory? How are they defined (provide examples)? Are these reasonable constructs to measure deviance?
(18) What are the similarities and differences of individual theories and structure/process theories of crime?
(32) How do integrated theories propose to reduce the number of viable theories in criminology?
(36) A concern with integrated theories is the potential for competing assumptions about human behavior.
(41) Are micro-level theories or macro-level theories better at explaining crime? Pick a theory at each level (micro and macro) and describe how an integrated theory that incorporates both would explain criminal behavior or desistance from crime.
(42) Integrating theories can require modifications of the original theories being integrated.
(36) How is a risk factor approach different from traditional criminological theory explanations of crime?
(42) Tittle's control balance theory proposes that crime is a function of:
(37) Agnew's general theory is not testable because the sheer number of variables could overwhelm a statistical package.
(26) Bernard and Snipes argue there are two types of theories, individual difference theories and:
(32) A newer approach to assessing theories, _______________, relies on structured probabilities.
(41) Describe the different levels addressed by Integrated Systems Theory. How is this integrated theory different from the individual components it combines in a unified theory? What are the challenges in testing this theory?
(37) John Braithwaite indicates that there are two types of shaming. These are:
(32) 
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)