Exam 14: Developmental and Life-Course Theories
How are Sampson and Laub's age-graded informal social control theory and Hirschi's social bond theory similar? How are they different? Which one is a better explanation of criminal behavior? Why?
Sampson and Laub's age-graded informal social control theory and Hirschi's social bond theory are similar in that they both focus on the role of social relationships and bonds in preventing criminal behavior. Both theories emphasize the importance of strong social ties, attachment to conventional institutions, involvement in conventional activities, and belief in the moral validity of social norms as protective factors against criminal behavior.
However, they differ in their emphasis on the timing and nature of these social bonds. Sampson and Laub's theory specifically focuses on the impact of informal social control and social bonds formed in childhood and adolescence on later criminal behavior, while Hirschi's theory looks at the broader concept of social bonds throughout the lifespan.
In terms of which theory is a better explanation of criminal behavior, it is difficult to determine a clear winner. Both theories have been influential in understanding the role of social bonds in preventing criminal behavior, and each offers valuable insights into the complex interplay of social relationships and individual behavior.
Sampson and Laub's theory provides a compelling explanation for the impact of early social bonds on later criminal behavior, while Hirschi's theory offers a more comprehensive framework for understanding the ongoing influence of social bonds across the lifespan. Ultimately, the most effective approach may be to consider the complementary insights offered by both theories in understanding the multifaceted nature of criminal behavior.
Context can influence whether someone desists from crime.
True
Institutions such as military service and marriage may act as informal social controls to facilitate desistance.
True
Laub and Sampson's theory of age-graded informal social control can only explain adult offending.
What are the turning points and transitions in Sampson and Laub's age-graded theory of informal social control? How do they differ, and what is their role in criminal offending onset and desistance?
Cognitive shifts resulting in the development of a prosocial identity are used by Maruna (2001) to explain desistence among offenders.
Is the developmental perspective an individual theory, or a way to frame our understanding of existing theories?
Describe Tremblay's perspective on the development of physical aggression. How does this mirror the age-crime curve argument?
Which of the following is NOT a key concept in life course theories (according to Elder, 1998)?
What is the role of agency in desistance from crime? Can agency also explain criminal behavior?
How does the life course paradigm explain onset, continuance, and desistance from offending?
The life course paradigm can explain which of the following?
Name three challenges life course persistent offenders experience that are believed to contribute to their criminal behavior. Why are these challenges precursors to criminality? Can they be addressed/altered to reduce risk?
Terrie Moffitt's life course persistent offenders often have problems with:
According to developmental theories, researchers need to examine individuals:
What is the difference between a career criminal and a criminal career? Are they mutually exclusive or is there some overlap?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)