Exam 2: The Comparative World-Systems Approach
Discuss the spatial bounding of world-systems.
The spatial bounding of world-systems refers to the geographical and physical limits that define the scope and reach of a particular world-system. World-systems theory, developed by sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein, suggests that the world is divided into interconnected and interdependent economic and political systems, with each system having its own spatial boundaries.
These spatial boundaries can be defined by a variety of factors, including geographical features such as mountains, rivers, and oceans, as well as political and cultural boundaries such as national borders and trade networks. The spatial bounding of world-systems also takes into account the distribution of resources, population, and economic activity within a given area.
In the context of globalization, the spatial bounding of world-systems has become increasingly complex, as advancements in technology and transportation have made it easier for goods, information, and people to move across traditional boundaries. This has led to the emergence of global networks and interconnected systems that transcend traditional spatial limitations.
Understanding the spatial bounding of world-systems is important for analyzing global economic and political dynamics, as well as for understanding the impact of globalization on different regions and societies. By examining the spatial boundaries of world-systems, researchers can gain insights into the distribution of power, resources, and influence within and between different world-systems, and how these boundaries are constantly evolving in response to changing economic, political, and social forces.
Some world-systems get stuck in a vicious cycle of conflict and population pressure.
True
The categories of core, periphery and semiperiphery, as defined in Chapter 2, are understood as designating relative position in a multidimensional hierarchy.
True
The hegemonic sequence in the modern world-system refers to:
Discuss and critique the concept of "modes of accumulation" as presented in Chapter 2.
Explain the conceptual distinction between core/periphery hierarchy and core/periphery differentiation and the reasons why this distinction is useful.
The polities with the largest settlements always exploit people with smaller settlements.
Prestige goods are more important in some world-systems than in others.
Why is it desirable to study groups of interacting polities rather than single polities one at a time?
Hierarchy formation and technological development often occur in a context of relatively high conflict and population pressure.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)