Exam 3: The Ethics and Politics of Research: Doing What's "Right"
Mark Regnerus may have violated the ethics of social responsibility because he
D
According to federal regulations, informed consent statements must include all but which of the following elements?
D
The Belmont Report presented three ethical principles that formed the basis for the development of federal regulations for protecting research participants: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Carefully explain how these principles underlie regulations regarding risk of harm and informed consent.
The three ethical principles presented in The Belmont Report - respect for persons, beneficence, and justice - form the foundation for regulations regarding the risk of harm and informed consent in research.
Respect for persons requires that individuals have the autonomy to make their own decisions and be treated with dignity and respect. This principle underlies regulations regarding informed consent, as it mandates that researchers must fully inform participants about the potential risks and benefits of the study, as well as their right to refuse or withdraw from participation at any time. Informed consent ensures that participants are able to make voluntary and informed decisions about their involvement in research, thus upholding the principle of respect for persons.
Beneficence emphasizes the obligation to maximize benefits and minimize harm to research participants. This principle underlies regulations regarding the risk of harm, as it requires researchers to carefully assess and minimize potential risks to participants. Federal regulations require researchers to conduct thorough risk assessments and implement measures to mitigate any potential harm to participants. This ensures that the potential benefits of the research outweigh the potential risks, aligning with the principle of beneficence.
Justice requires that the benefits and burdens of research be distributed fairly among all potential participants. This principle underlies regulations regarding the risk of harm, as it mandates that researchers must ensure that the potential risks of the research are distributed equitably among all participants. Additionally, justice also underlies regulations regarding informed consent, as it requires that vulnerable populations are not unfairly targeted for participation in research. Federal regulations include specific protections for vulnerable populations, such as children, prisoners, and individuals with diminished autonomy, to ensure that they are not unduly burdened by research participation.
In summary, the ethical principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice underlie regulations regarding the risk of harm and informed consent by ensuring that participants are treated with autonomy and respect, potential risks are minimized, and the benefits and burdens of research are distributed fairly among all participants. These principles serve as the ethical framework for the protection of research participants in federal regulations.
The ideal of value neutrality applies to data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
As the chapter on ethics and politics reveals, research ethics pertain to all except which of the following?
The Coburn amendment to the 2013 U.S. spending bill was intended to
According to Box 3.3, which of the following is true of the ethics of data collection and analysis in the social sciences?
The question of conflict of interest arose in the Mark Regnerus study because
Aside from controlling the amount of funds available for research, politicians have very little influence on what researchers choose to study.
According to Box 3.3, to promote ethical data collection and analysis, it is recommended that social scientists
The brief filed by the American Sociological Association in the 2013 U.S. Supreme Court cases involving same-sex marriage
Each of the following statements is true of the influence of politics on social research except
One way that researchers deal with the influence of politics on their research is to acknowledge their own values.
Some scholars have maintained that social science should be completely "value-free." That is, so far as possible, social scientists should eliminate personal values from their research, and they should remain impartial regarding the application of their findings. Their only obligation, in short, is to accurately report what they know, based on their research. Carefully evaluate the tenability of this position. Is it consistent with ethical guidelines regarding the dissemination of knowledge?
A student doing research on sexual behavior conducts an online survey that he tells participants is anonymous. In reality, the IP addresses enable him to identify people who respond, and he uses this information for a follow-up study. In what way(s) is this study ethically problematic?
To avoid the influence of politics on topic selection, a researcher would need to
Explain and give examples of how Mark Regnerus's study on the impact of same-sex and opposite-sex parenting involves issues of both ethics and politics.
According to Box 3.3, some social scientists consider careless errors and poorly conducted research violations of research ethics.
In studies in which research participants' identities are known to the researcher, the principal way to protect their privacy is to
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)