Exam 20: The Narrative Paradigm

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

The logic of good reasons presents a listener with a set of values that appeal to her or him and form warrants for accepting or rejecting the advice advanced by any form of narrative.

Free
(True/False)
4.9/5
(25)
Correct Answer:
Verified

True

The narrative paradigm suggests that all stories are equally effective.

Free
(True/False)
4.8/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
Verified

False

How is fidelity used as a standard for assessing narrative rationality?

Free
(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(31)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Fidelity, in the context of narrative rationality, refers to the credibility or believability of a story and how well it resonates with the listener's experiences and understanding of the world. Narrative rationality is a concept developed by communication theorist Walter Fisher, who proposed that all meaningful communication is a form of storytelling or narration and that humans are essentially storytellers.

Fisher introduced the narrative paradigm as an alternative to the traditional rational-world paradigm, which emphasizes argumentative reasoning and logical analysis. According to Fisher, the narrative paradigm suggests that people make sense of the world and the experiences within it by relating them to stories and that they judge the reliability and trustworthiness of these narratives based on two criteria: coherence and fidelity.

Coherence refers to the internal consistency of the story—how well the elements of the narrative fit together. Fidelity, on the other hand, is concerned with the truthfulness and reliability of the narrative. It is about whether the story corresponds to the reality the listeners know or believe to be true, and whether it provides a reliable guide to human conduct.

To assess narrative fidelity, one might consider the following factors:

1. **Factuality**: Does the narrative align with known facts and evidence? Are the events portrayed in the story consistent with the listener's understanding of how the world works?

2. **Context**: Does the story make sense within the context it is presented? Does it acknowledge the complexity of the real world and the nuances of human experience?

3. **Values**: Does the narrative reflect values that the audience holds or can relate to? Are the moral implications of the story consistent with the listener's ethical beliefs?

4. **Relevance**: Is the narrative relevant to the listener's life? Does it speak to their experiences, concerns, or aspirations?

5. **Consequences**: Does the story suggest reasonable and acceptable outcomes? Are the consequences of actions within the narrative consistent with what the listener understands about cause and effect?

When a narrative has high fidelity, listeners are more likely to accept it as a truthful and reliable account, and it is more likely to influence their beliefs and actions. In contrast, a narrative with low fidelity may be dismissed as untrustworthy or irrelevant.

In summary, fidelity is used as a standard for assessing narrative rationality by evaluating how well a story aligns with the listener's own knowledge, experiences, and values. It is a measure of a narrative's capacity to provide a trustworthy and meaningful guide to understanding the world and making decisions within it.

Narrative rationality

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(43)

All of the following are questions the listener asks about the narrative regarding a "logic of good reasons" EXCEPT

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)

Fisher argues that all communication is storytelling.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(35)

Comment upon the following statement within the context of the Narrative Paradigm: "Stories are lived experiences which are random, unpredictable, and spontaneous." What does the statement mean to you? How does it apply to Fisher's theory? Discuss the statement using some key concepts of the theory.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(40)

Evaluate a story you heard recently on at least five concepts of the narrative paradigm as you deem relevant. Did you believe the story? Explain why or why not, invoking the appropriate concepts from narrative paradigm.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(27)

The narrative paradigm asserts that logic and rational thinking are the bases of human beliefs.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(35)

What does Fisher mean by "good reasons"?

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(36)

The significant change in thinking from viewing persuasion as resulting from well-reasoned arguments to acknowledging that humans are often more persuaded by a good story, has been called a

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(28)

Which approach to knowing characterizes the research undertaken using the narrative paradigm?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)

After listening to his daughter's story about an event that happened at school, Alberto says, "I believe the story because a similar thing happened to me when I was in sixth grade." Alberto is judging his daughter's story on the basis of

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(31)

Identify, define, and provide an example of the three types of coherence used to evaluate a narrative.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(32)

Which of the following is NOT one of the consistencies used to judge the coherence of a story?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)

Narratives

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)

How would you go about using narrative paradigm to frame a study about how individuals assess narratives? Select a particular context and type of narrative or narrative topic to investigate in your study. Develop a research question or hypothesis and describe your study.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(31)

After seeing the movie Next Stop, Abigail tells Ruthie that she did not believe the characters. In fact, Abigail thinks that the actions of the characters in the movie were inconsistent with their motivations. The basis on which Abigail judges the characters in Next Stop is known as

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(30)

The narrative paradigm asserts that

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)

The authors of your text comment that "the Narrative Paradigm has made a substantial contribution to our understanding of human communication and human nature in general." Based upon your understanding of the theory, is their claim too broad and wishful? What evidence and examples can you point to in order to justify your opinion?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(40)
Showing 1 - 20 of 36
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)