Exam 18: The Rhetoric

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The three types of oratory are deliberative, judicial, and epideictic.

1. Deliberative oratory is focused on persuading an audience to take a specific course of action. An example of this type of oratory is a political speech urging citizens to support a particular policy or legislation.

2. Judicial oratory is centered around legal matters and is used to persuade an audience about the guilt or innocence of a person or the justice of a particular cause. An example of this type of oratory is a lawyer's closing argument in a court case.

3. Epideictic oratory is ceremonial in nature and is used to praise or blame someone or something. An example of this type of oratory is a eulogy at a funeral or a speech honoring a public figure.

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Aristotle's ideas can be evaluated according to the criteria used to judge theories in several ways.

First, his ideas can be evaluated based on their coherence and logical consistency. Aristotle's theories were often based on careful observation and logical reasoning, and they were presented in a systematic and coherent manner. This logical consistency is a positive aspect of his ideas.

Second, his ideas can be evaluated based on their empirical support. Aristotle's ideas were often based on empirical observations of the natural world, and he used these observations to develop his theories. However, some of his ideas have been found to be incorrect based on modern scientific understanding, which can be seen as a limitation.

Third, his ideas can be evaluated based on their explanatory power. Aristotle's theories were often able to provide explanations for natural phenomena and human behavior, and they were influential in shaping the development of Western thought. However, some of his ideas have been superseded by more accurate and comprehensive explanations, which can be seen as a limitation.

Overall, Aristotle's ideas can be judged as influential and important in the history of philosophy and science, but they also have limitations in terms of empirical support and accuracy. When evaluating his ideas, it is important to consider both their strengths and weaknesses in order to gain a comprehensive understanding of their significance.