Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statementsintra-Entity Asset Transactions

On November 8, 2011, Power Corp. sold land to Wood Co., its wholly owned subsidiary. The land cost $61,500 and was sold to Wood for $89,000. From the perspective of the combination, when is the gain on the sale of the land realized?

Stiller Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Leo Company, purchased land from Leo on March 1, 2010, for $75,000. The land originally cost Leo $60,000. Stiller reported net income of $125,000 and $140,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. Leo uses the equity method to account for its investment. Compute the gain or loss on the intra-entity sale of land.

On January 1, 2011, Payton Co. sold equipment to its subsidiary, Starker Corp., for $115,000. The equipment had cost $125,000, and the balance in accumulated depreciation was $45,000. The equipment had an estimated remaining useful life of eight years and $0 salvage value. Both companies use straight-line depreciation. On their separate 2011 income statements, Payton and Starker reported depreciation expense of $84,000 and $60,000, respectively. The amount of depreciation expense on the consolidated income statement for 2011 would have been

Virginia Corp. owned all of the voting common stock of Stateside Co. Both companies use the perpetual inventory method, and Virginia decided to use the partial equity method to account for this investment. During 2010, Virginia made cash sales of $400,000 to Stateside. The gross profit rate was 30% of the selling price. By the end of 2010, Stateside had sold 75% of the goods to outside parties for $420,000 cash. Prepare journal entries for Virginia and Stateside to record the sales/purchases during 2010.

When comparing the difference between an upstream and downstream transfer of inventory, and using the initial value method, which of the following statements is true when there is a non-controlling interest?

Pepe, Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company on January 1, 2010. On that date Devin sold equipment to Pepe for $45,000. The equipment had a cost of $120,000 and accumulated depreciation of $66,000 with a remaining life of 9 years. Devin reported net income of $300,000 and $325,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. Pepe uses the equity method to account for its investment in Devin. Compute the income from Devin reported on Pepe's books for 2011.

Stiller Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Leo Company, purchased land from Leo on March 1, 2010, for $75,000. The land originally cost Leo $60,000. Stiller reported net income of $125,000 and $140,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. Leo uses the equity method to account for its investment. On a consolidation worksheet, what adjustment would be made for 2010 regarding the land transfer?

On January 1, 2010, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc., transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes. Compute the gain recognized by Smeder Company relating to the equipment for 2010.

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2010. On January 1, 2010, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2010 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: Compute Wilson's share of income from Simon for consolidation for 2012.

Yukon Co. acquired 75% percent of the voting common stock of Ontario Corp. on January 1, 2011. During the year, Yukon made sales of inventory to Ontario. The inventory cost Yukon $260,000 and was sold to Ontario for $390,000. Ontario still had $60,000 of the goods in its inventory at the end of the year. The amount of unrealized intra-entity profit that should be eliminated in the consolidation process at the end of 2011 is

Stark Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Parker, Inc., sold land to Parker on May 1, 2010, for $80,000. The land originally cost Stark $85,000. Stark reported net income of $200,000, $180,000, and $220,000 for 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively. Parker sold the land purchased from Stark in 2010 for $92,000 in 2012. Which of the following will be included in a consolidation entry for 2010?

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010. Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. Compute the equity in earnings of Gargiulo reported on Posito's books for 2011.

Flintstone Inc. acquired all of Rubble Co. on January 1, 2011. Flintstone decided to use the initial value method to account for this investment. During 2011, Flintstone sold to Rubble for $600,000 inventory with a cost of $500,000. At the end of the year 30% of the goods were still in Rubble's inventory. Required: Prepare Consolidation Entry TI for the intra-entity transfer and Consolidation Entry G for the ending inventory adjustment necessary for the consolidation worksheet at 12/31/11.

Prince Corp. owned 80% of Kile Corp.'s common stock. During October 2011, Kile sold merchandise to Prince for $140,000. At December 31, 2011, 50% of this merchandise remained in Prince's inventory. For 2011, gross profit percentages were 30% of sales for Prince and 40% of sales for Kile. The amount of unrealized intra-entity profit in ending inventory at December 31, 2011 that should be eliminated in the consolidation process is

On January 1, 2011, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2011, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows: During 2011, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31. What is the total of consolidated revenues?

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2010. In the consolidation worksheet for 2011, assuming Carter uses the initial value method of accounting for its investment in Strickland, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2010 intra-entity sales?

Which of the following statements is true regarding an intra-entity sale of land?

Walsh Company sells inventory to its subsidiary, Fisher Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Walsh uses the equity method to account for its investment in Fisher. In the consolidation worksheet for 2010, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate the intra-entity transfer of inventory?

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010. Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. For consolidation purposes, what amount would be debited to cost of goods sold for the 2012 consolidation worksheet with regard to the unrealized gross profit of the 2012 intra-entity transfer of merchandise?

Yoderly Co., a wholly owned subsidiary of Nelson Corp., sold goods to Nelson near the end of 2011. The goods had cost Yoderly $105,000 and the selling price was $140,000. Nelson had not sold any of the goods by the end of the year. Required: Prepare Consolidation Entry TI and Consolidation Entry G that are required for 2011.