Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statementsintra-Entity Asset Transactions
Exam 1: The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments119 Questions
Exam 2: Consolidation of Financial Information118 Questions
Exam 3: Consolidationssubsequent to the Date of Acquisition122 Questions
Exam 4: Consolidated Financial Statements and Outside Ownership115 Questions
Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statementsintra-Entity Asset Transactions127 Questions
Exam 6: Variable Interest Entities, Intra-Entity Debt, Consolidated Cash Flows, and Other Issues115 Questions
Exam 7: Foreign Currency Transactions and Hedging Foreign Exchange Risk93 Questions
Exam 8: Translation of Foreign Currency Financial Statements97 Questions
Exam 9: Partnerships: Formation and Operation88 Questions
Exam 10: Partnerships: Termination and Liquidation69 Questions
Exam 11: Accounting for State and Local Governments Part 178 Questions
Exam 12: Accounting for State and Local Governments Part 251 Questions
Select questions type
Stark Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Parker, Inc., sold land to Parker on May 1, 2010, for $80,000. The land originally cost Stark $85,000. Stark reported net income of $200,000, $180,000, and $220,000 for 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively. Parker sold the land purchased from Stark in 2010 for $92,000 in 2012.
Compute Parker's reported gain or loss relating to the land for 2012.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(40)
An intra-entity sale took place whereby the transfer price exceeded the book value of a depreciable asset. Which statement is true for the year following the sale?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
Dalton Corp. owned 70% of the outstanding common stock of Shrugs Inc. On January 1, 2009, Dalton acquired a building with a ten-year life for $420,000. No salvage value was anticipated and the building was to be depreciated on the straight-line basis. On January 1, 2011, Dalton sold this building to Shrugs for $392,000. At that time, the building had a remaining life of eight years but still no expected salvage value. In preparing financial statements for 2011, how does this transfer affect the calculation of Dalton's share of consolidated net income?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)
On January 1, 2011, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired.
As of December 31, 2011, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows:
During 2011, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31.
What is the total of consolidated operating expenses?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(44)
Strayten Corp. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Quint Inc. Quint decided to use the initial value method to account for this investment. During 2011, Strayten sold Quint goods which had cost $48,000. The selling price was $64,000. Quint still had one-eighth of the goods purchased from Strayten on hand at the end of 2011.
Required:
Prepare Consolidation Entry *G, which would have to be recorded at the end of 2011.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(44)
On January 1, 2011, Race Corp. acquired 80% of the voting common stock of Gallow Inc. During the year, Race sold to Gallow for $450,000 goods which cost $330,000. Gallow still owned 15% of the goods at year-end. Gallow's reported net income was $204,000, and Race's net income was $806,000. Race decided to use the equity method to account for this investment. What was the non-controlling interest's share of consolidated net income?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)
An intra-entity sale took place whereby the transfer price was less than the book value of a depreciable asset. Which statement is true for the year following the sale?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
Clemente Co. owned all of the voting common stock of Snider Co. On January 2, 2010, Clemente sold equipment to Snider for $125,000. The equipment had cost Clemente $140,000. At the time of the sale, the balance in accumulated depreciation was $40,000. The equipment had a remaining useful life of five years and a $0 salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used by both Clemente and Snider.
At what amount should the equipment (net of depreciation) be included in the consolidated balance sheet dated December 31, 2011?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(48)
What is meant by unrealized inventory gains, and how are they treated on a consolidation worksheet?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(33)
Varton Corp. acquired all of the voting common stock of Caleb Co. on January 1, 2011. Varton owned some land with a book value of $84,000 that was sold to Caleb for its fair value of $120,000. How should this transaction be accounted for by the consolidated entity?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(43)
On January 1, 2011, Musial Corp. sold equipment to Matin Inc. (a wholly-owned subsidiary) for $168,000 in cash. The equipment originally cost $140,000 but had a book value of only $98,000 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense was calculated using the straight-line method.
Musial earned $308,000 in net income in 2011 (not including any investment income) while Matin reported $126,000. Assume there is no amortization related to the original investment.
Assuming that Musial owned only 90% of Matin, what is consolidated net income for 2011?
(Essay)
4.9/5
(37)
Justings Co. owned 80% of Evana Corp. During 2011, Justings sold to Evana land with a book value of $48,000. The selling price was $70,000. In its accounting records, Justings should
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(42)
McGraw Corp. owned all of the voting common stock of both Ritter Co. and Lawler Co. During 2011, Ritter sold inventory to Lawler. The goods had cost Ritter $65,000, and they were sold to Lawler for $100,000. At the end of 2011, Lawler still held 30% of the inventory.
Required:
How should the sale between Lawler and Ritter be accounted for in a consolidation worksheet? Show worksheet entries to support your answer.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(44)
Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010.
Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends.
Compute the equity in earnings of Gargiulo reported on Posito's books for 2012.


(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
On January 1, 2010, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc., transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes.
For consolidation purposes, what net debit or credit will be made for the year 2010 relating to the accumulated depreciation for the equipment transfer?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)
Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010.
Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends.
For consolidation purposes, what amount would be debited to January 1 retained earnings for the 2012 consolidation worksheet entry with regard to the unrealized gross profit of the 2011 intra-entity transfer of merchandise?


(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)
Walsh Company sells inventory to its subsidiary, Fisher Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Walsh uses the equity method to account for its investment in Fisher.
In the consolidation worksheet for 2010, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate the intra-entity transfer of inventory?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
Chain Co. owned all of the voting common stock of Shannon Corp. The corporations' balance sheets dated December 31, 2010, include the following balances for land: for Chain--$416,000, and for Shannon--$256,000. On the original date of acquisition, the book value of Shannon's land was equal to its fair value. On April 4, 2011, Chain sold to Shannon a parcel of land with a book value of $65,000. The selling price was $83,000. There were no other transactions which affected the companies' land accounts during 2010. What is the consolidated balance for land on the 2011 balance sheet?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(35)
Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2010.
In the consolidation worksheet for 2010, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2010 intra-entity sales?
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
Walsh Company sells inventory to its subsidiary, Fisher Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Walsh uses the equity method to account for its investment in Fisher.
In the consolidation worksheet for 2010, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2010 intra-entity sales?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)
Showing 61 - 80 of 127
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)