Exam 5: Consolidated Financial Statementsintra-Entity Asset Transactions

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010. Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. Compute the non-controlling interest in Gargiulo's net income for 2012.

For each of the following situations (1 - 10), select the correct entry (A - E) that would be required on a consolidation worksheet. (A.) Debit retained earnings. (B.) Credit retained earnings. (C.) Debit investment in subsidiary. (D.) Credit investment in subsidiary. (E.) None of the above. ___ 1. Upstream beginning inventory profit, using the initial value method. ___ 2. Downstream beginning inventory profit, using the initial value method. ___ 3. Upstream ending inventory profit, using the initial value method. ___ 4. Downstream ending inventory profit, using the initial value method. ___ 5. Upstream transfer of depreciable assets, in the period after transfer, where subsidiary recognizes a gain, using the initial value method. ___ 6. Downstream transfer of depreciable assets, in the period after transfer, where parent recognizes a gain, using the initial value method. ___ 7. Upstream transfer of land, in the period after transfer, where subsidiary recognizes a loss, using the initial value method. ___ 8. Downstream transfer of land, in the period after transfer, where parent recognizes a loss, using the initial value method. ___ 9. Eliminate income from subsidiary, recorded under the equity method. ___ 10. Eliminate recorded amortization of acquisition fair value over book value, recorded under the equity method.

Stiller Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Leo Company, purchased land from Leo on March 1, 2010, for $75,000. The land originally cost Leo $60,000. Stiller reported net income of $125,000 and $140,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. Leo uses the equity method to account for its investment. Compute income from Stiller on Leo's books for 2010.

Stark Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Parker, Inc., sold land to Parker on May 1, 2010, for $80,000. The land originally cost Stark $85,000. Stark reported net income of $200,000, $180,000, and $220,000 for 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively. Parker sold the land purchased from Stark in 2010 for $92,000 in 2012. Compute income from Stark reported on Parker's books for 2010.

Gargiulo Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Posito Corporation, sells inventory to Posito at a 25% profit on selling price. The following data are available pertaining to intra-entity purchases. Gargiulo was acquired on January 1, 2010. Assume the equity method is used. The following data are available pertaining to Gargiulo's income and dividends. For consolidation purposes, what amount would be debited to January 1 retained earnings for the 2010 consolidation worksheet entry with regard to the unrealized gross profit of the 2010 intra-entity transfer of merchandise?

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2010. In the consolidation worksheet for 2011, assuming Carter uses the initial value method of accounting for its investment in Strickland, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2010 intra-entity sales?

Edgar Co. acquired 60% of Stendall Co. on January 1, 2011. During 2011, Edgar made several sales of inventory to Stendall. The cost and selling price of the goods were $140,000 and $200,000, respectively. Stendall still owned one-fourth of the goods at the end of 2011. Consolidated cost of goods sold for 2011 was $2,140,000 because of a consolidating adjustment for intra-entity sales less the entire profit remaining in Stendall's ending inventory. How would non-controlling interest in net income have differed if the transfers had been for the same amount and cost, but from Stendall to Edgar?

Hambly Corp. owned 80% of the voting common stock of Stroban Co. During 2011, Stroban sold a parcel of land to Hambly. The land had a book value of $82,000 and was sold to Hambly for $145,000. Stroban's reported net income for 2011 was $119,000. Required: What was the non-controlling interest's share of Stroban Co.'s net income?

On April 7, 2011, Pate Corp. sold land to Shannahan Co., its subsidiary. From a consolidated point of view, when will the gain on this transfer actually be earned?

Dithers Inc. acquired all of the common stock of Bumstead Corp. on January 1, 2011. During 2011, Bumstead sold land to Dithers at a gain. No consolidation entry for the sale of the land was made at the end of 2011. What errors will this omission cause in the consolidated financial statements?

Pot Co. holds 90% of the common stock of Skillet Co. During 2011, Pot reported sales of $1,120,000 and cost of goods sold of $840,000. For this same period, Skillet had sales of $420,000 and cost of goods sold of $252,000. Included in the amounts for Pot's sales were Pot's sales of merchandise to Skillet for $140,000. There were no sales from Skillet to Pot. Intra-entity sales had the same markup as sales to outsiders. Skillet still had 40% of the intra-entity sales as inventory at the end of 2011. What are consolidated sales and cost of goods sold for 2011?

On January 1, 2010, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc., transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes. Compute Collins' share of Smeder's net income for 2010.

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2010. On January 1, 2010, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2010 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: Compute the amortization of gain through a depreciation adjustment for 2010 for consolidation purposes.

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2010. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2010. In the consolidation worksheet for 2010, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2010 intra-entity sales?

On January 1, 2010, Smeder Company, an 80% owned subsidiary of Collins, Inc., transferred equipment with a 10-year life (six of which remain with no salvage value) to Collins in exchange for $84,000 cash. At the date of transfer, Smeder's records carried the equipment at a cost of $120,000 less accumulated depreciation of $48,000. Straight-line depreciation is used. Smeder reported net income of $28,000 and $32,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. All net income effects of the intra-entity transfer are attributed to the seller for consolidation purposes. What is the net effect on consolidated net income in 2010 due to the equipment transfer?

Pepe, Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company on January 1, 2010. On that date Devin sold equipment to Pepe for $45,000. The equipment had a cost of $120,000 and accumulated depreciation of $66,000 with a remaining life of 9 years. Devin reported net income of $300,000 and $325,000 for 2010 and 2011, respectively. Pepe uses the equity method to account for its investment in Devin. What is the consolidated gain or loss on equipment for 2010?

Stark Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Parker, Inc., sold land to Parker on May 1, 2010, for $80,000. The land originally cost Stark $85,000. Stark reported net income of $200,000, $180,000, and $220,000 for 2010, 2011, and 2012, respectively. Parker sold the land purchased from Stark in 2010 for $92,000 in 2012. Which of the following will be included in a consolidation entry for 2011?

Patti Company owns 80% of the common stock of Shannon, Inc. In the current year, Patti reports sales of $10,000,000 and cost of goods sold of $7,500,000. For the same period, Shannon has sales of $200,000 and cost of goods sold of $160,000. During the year, Patti sold merchandise to Shannon for $60,000 at a price based on the normal markup. At the end of the year, Shannon still possesses 30 percent of this inventory. Assume the same information, except Shannon sold inventory to Patti. Compute consolidated sales.

On January 1, 2011, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired. As of December 31, 2011, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows: During 2011, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31. What is the total of consolidated cost of goods sold?

Wilson owned equipment with an estimated life of 10 years when it was acquired for an original cost of $80,000. The equipment had a book value of $50,000 at January 1, 2010. On January 1, 2010, Wilson realized that the useful life of the equipment was longer than originally anticipated, at ten remaining years. On April 1, 2010 Simon Company, a 90% owned subsidiary of Wilson Company, bought the equipment from Wilson for $68,250 and for depreciation purposes used the estimated remaining life as of that date. The following data are available pertaining to Simon's income and dividends: Compute the amortization of gain through a depreciation adjustment for 2011 for consolidation purposes.