Exam 8: Discrimination Based On Religion And National Origin & Procedures Under
Exam 1: First The Forest, Then The Trees: An Overview Of Employment And Labor Law40 Questions
Exam 2: Employment Contracts And Wrongful Discharge45 Questions
Exam 3: Commonly Committed Workplace Torts50 Questions
Exam 4: Employee Privacy Rights In The 21st Century50 Questions
Exam 5: The Global Perspective: International Employment Law And American Immigration Policy49 Questions
Exam 6: Title Vii Of The Civil Rights Act And Race Discrimination50 Questions
Exam 7: Gender And Family Issues: Title Vii And Other Legislation50 Questions
Exam 8: Discrimination Based On Religion And National Origin & Procedures Under50 Questions
Exam 9: Discrimination Based on Age46 Questions
Exam 10: Discrimination Based On Disability50 Questions
Exam 11: Other Eeo And Employment Legislation: Federal And State Laws48 Questions
Exam 12: The Rise Of Organized Labor And Its Regulatory Framework49 Questions
Exam 13: The Unionization Process47 Questions
Exam 14: Unfair Labor Practices By Employers And Unions46 Questions
Exam 15: Collective Bargaining50 Questions
Exam 16: Picketing And Strikes49 Questions
Exam 17: The Enforcement And Administration Of The Collective Agreement48 Questions
Exam 18: The Rights Of Union Members50 Questions
Exam 19: Public Sector Labor Relations50 Questions
Exam 20: Occupational Safety And Health49 Questions
Exam 21: The employee’ s safety nets: unemployment and workers’ compensation social security and retirement plans50 Questions
Exam 22: The fair labor standards act49 Questions
Select questions type
The decision of the U.S.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Webb v.City of Philadelphia,in which Officer Webb filed a complaint of religious discrimination under Title VII with the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission and the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,stated that:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
Which section of Title VII states that it is not a violation if an employer refuses to hire or to discharge an employee who is unable to meet the requirements for a national security clearance where federal law or regulations require such a clearance for the job in question?
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(47)
Dorothy filed a complaint with the EEOC against her employer alleging sex-based discrimination.The complaint can be filed with the EEOC:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)
The Civil Rights Act of 1991 amended Title VII to allow recovery of punitive damages in cases in which the employer has engaged in:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)
The Office of Compliance initially attempts to resolve the complaint through:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)
All of the following individuals are subject to Title VII through the Presidential and Executive Office Accountability Act except employees of the:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(32)
Complaints by federal of violations of Title VII may choose to pursue the complaint with the:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)
Section 702(a) provides an exception under Title VII to all:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
In McDonnell Douglas Corp.v.Green,the respondent (Green) filed a formal complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,claiming that the petitioner had refused to rehire him because of his race,and persistent involvement in the civil rights movement which were in violation of Sections 703(a)(1) and 704 (a).How would Green claim a case of discrimination?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
Discuss the Equal Employment opportunity commission (EEOC) guidelines that are considered in determining what amounts to reasonable accommodation and whether it results in undue hardship.
(Essay)
4.9/5
(41)
Ron and Roderick were American employees at a publishing firm.The company employed 22 workers,most of who were French or spoke French.There were constant complaints pertaining to language issues by Ron and Roderick.The company subsequently adopted an "English-only" policy,requiring employees to speak in English while conducting business.The French employees and the union then filed a lawsuit against the company,alleging that the English-only policy violated Title VII.In this case,the court held that there was no violation of Title VII because:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(45)
The judgment of the court in Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v.Amos,in which plaintiffs brought action against the CPB and the COP alleging,among other things,discrimination on the basis of religion in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,was:
(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(40)
What are the two methods for a defendant to respond when a prima-facie case of disparate treatment has been established?
(Essay)
4.8/5
(43)
Showing 21 - 40 of 50
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)