Exam 13: The Unionization Process
Exam 1: First the Forest, Then the Trees: an Overview of Employment and Labor Law40 Questions
Exam 2: Employment Contracts and Wrongful Discharge45 Questions
Exam 3: Commonly Committed Workplace Torts50 Questions
Exam 4: Employee Privacy Rights in the 21st Century50 Questions
Exam 5: The Global Perspective: International Employment Law and American Immigration Policy49 Questions
Exam 6: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Race Discrimination50 Questions
Exam 7: Gender and Family Issues: Title VII and Other Legislation50 Questions
Exam 8: Discrimination Based on Religion and National Origin Procedures Under Title VII50 Questions
Exam 9: Discrimination Based on Age46 Questions
Exam 10: Discrimination Based on Disability50 Questions
Exam 11: Other Eeo and Employment Legislation: Federal and State Laws48 Questions
Exam 12: The Rise of Organized Labor and Its Regulatory Framework49 Questions
Exam 13: The Unionization Process47 Questions
Exam 14: Unfair Labor Practices by Employers and Unions46 Questions
Exam 15: Collective Bargaining50 Questions
Exam 16: Picketing and Strikes49 Questions
Exam 17: The Enforcement and Administration of the Collective Agreement48 Questions
Exam 18: The Rights of Union Members50 Questions
Exam 19: Public Sector Labor Relations50 Questions
Exam 20: Occupational Safety and Health49 Questions
Exam 21: The Employee's Safety Nets: Unemployment and Workers' Compensation, Social Security, and Retirement Plans50 Questions
Exam 22: The Fair Labor Standards Act49 Questions
Select questions type
The employees of Freddy Auto Sales decided to select Peter as their bargaining representative for the purposes of collective bargaining by the majority of the employees. The major issues of negotiation include rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, or other conditions of employment. In this scenario, Peter is covered under the:
(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(33)
Stuart and Melvin were employees of ANZ Construction Company. They both sustained serious injuries while working and took a week off. The company awarded Stuart $500 as compensation, but nothing was awarded to Melvin. In this case, Melvin has the right to present his grievances to his employer without intervention of bargaining representative under the:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(33)
A bargaining representative election was held in Smith Electronic Company against the will of the employer. The employer threatened to terminate those employees who cast their vote during representative election. In this situation, the employer has violated:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)
In Comet Electric and Bro-Tech Corp. v. NLRB, the court held that any mass union rallies or employer captive-audience speeches during the _____ period will be grounds to set aside the election result.
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(45)
Economic strikers who have been permanently replaced may vote only in elections held within _____ after the strike begins.
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)
Elemental Chemical Manufacturing Company located in New York decided to conduct an election to elect bargaining representative. The NLRB established an eligibility date for the employees at the firm. Jacob Wiles was hired by the Elemental Chemicals after the eligibility date was prepared. In this case, Jacob:
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)
An employer is entitled to file a petition only after one or more individuals or unions present that employer with a claim for recognition as the bargaining representative according to:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Showing 41 - 47 of 47
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)