Exam 10: Confronting the Dark Side: Deception and Ethical Dilemmas
How can members of coalitions exert greater strength in multiparty negotiations?
By expressing solidarity with each other, by agreeing to help each other achieve their common or individual objectives, by dominating discussion time, and by agreeing to support each other as particular solutions and negotiated agreements emerge.
In the pre-negotiation phase of multilateral negotiations, issues about participants can be decided on the basis of what questions?
Who must be included if a deal is to be reached (key coalition members)? Who could spoil the deal if they were excluded (veto players)? Whose presence is likely to help other parties achieve their objectives (desirable coalition members)? Whose presence is likely to keep other parties from achieving their objectives (key coalition blockers)? Whose status will be enhanced simply by being at the table?
Regarding the development and management of conflict over time in high-performance task groups, three kinds of conflict typical to work groups were discussed. What are the three types?
Relationship conflict (interpersonal incompatibilities, dislike among group members, and feelings of tension, friction, annoyance, frustration and dislike); task conflicts (awareness of difference in viewpoints about the group's task); and process conflict (awareness of controversies about how task accomplishment will proceed-who will do what, how much one should get from a result, etc.).
Negotiators who are excluded from part of a multiparty negotiation often receive a larger share of the outcome than those who are present for the duration.
There are three types of expertise, negotiation expertise, technical expertise, and individual skills.
Which of the following techniques cannot be used to counteract destructive discussion norms?
Negotiators who have some way to control the number of parties at the table may begin to strategically manipulate this control to serve their objectives.
In what ways do multiparty negotiations differ from two-party deliberations?
One pointer on how to chair a multiparty negotiation effectively is to encourage people to express interests, mirror them back, and encourage people to identify not only what they want, but also why they want it.
When we hold negative views about the other side based solely on affiliation, this is called snowballing.
There are three types of expertise helpful in putting a team together, which of the following is not one of these?
Summarize the five ways in which the complexity increases as three or more parties simultaneously engage in negotiation.
Many complex international negotiations give a great deal of time to the question of who will be recognized and who can speak for others.
Chairpersons of multiparty negotiations must be sensitive to keeping tight control over the group process while not directly affecting the group's outcome.
In multiparty negotiations, research shows that parties who discuss multiple issues simultaneously achieved lower quality agreements.
When at least one of the negotiation parties is a team, studies show that more value is created.
Multiparty negotiations are more complex than two-party ones since the process they have to follow is more complicated.
As part of a nine-step comprehensive model of problem solving, the text suggests that four key problem solving steps occur during the agreement phase. What are the four steps?
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)