Exam 6: The Ways of Change: Drift and Selection
Explain how landscape genetics can influence the evolution of populations.
Landscape genetics is the study of how landscape features and environmental factors influence the genetic structure and evolution of populations. By examining the relationship between genetic variation and landscape features, researchers can gain insights into how populations are shaped by their environment.
One way in which landscape genetics can influence the evolution of populations is by identifying barriers to gene flow. Landscape features such as rivers, mountains, or human-made structures can act as barriers that limit the movement of individuals between different areas. This can lead to genetic isolation and the formation of distinct populations, which can ultimately drive the evolution of new species or subspecies.
Additionally, landscape genetics can help identify corridors or pathways that facilitate gene flow between populations. These connections can promote genetic exchange and prevent the loss of genetic diversity, which is important for the long-term survival and adaptability of populations.
Furthermore, landscape genetics can also provide insights into how environmental changes, such as habitat fragmentation or climate change, can impact the genetic diversity and adaptive potential of populations. By understanding how landscape features influence gene flow and genetic diversity, conservation efforts can be better informed to protect and manage populations in the face of environmental challenges.
Overall, landscape genetics plays a crucial role in understanding the evolutionary processes that shape populations, and can inform conservation and management strategies to ensure the long-term viability of species.
Compare two examples of genetic drift: the genetic bottleneck and the founder effect.
Genetic drift is a mechanism of evolution that occurs when there is a change in the frequency of certain alleles in a population due to random chance. Two examples of genetic drift are the genetic bottleneck and the founder effect.
The genetic bottleneck occurs when a population undergoes a drastic reduction in size, leading to a significant loss of genetic diversity. This can happen as a result of natural disasters, disease outbreaks, or human activities such as habitat destruction. The smaller population that emerges from the bottleneck will have a limited gene pool, and certain alleles may be overrepresented or lost entirely. This can lead to an increase in genetic disorders and a decrease in overall fitness.
On the other hand, the founder effect occurs when a small group of individuals establishes a new population in a different location. These individuals may not represent the full genetic diversity of the original population, and as a result, the new population will have a gene pool that is different from the original population. Over time, this can lead to the fixation of certain alleles and the loss of others, resulting in genetic differences between the two populations.
In both cases, genetic drift can lead to changes in allele frequencies and a loss of genetic diversity within a population. However, the genetic bottleneck is the result of a population size reduction, while the founder effect is the result of a small group of individuals founding a new population. Both processes can have significant impacts on the genetic makeup of a population and its ability to adapt to changing environments.
The probability of an allele being lost during a genetic bottleneck depends on
The graphs below show the results of simulations of the effect of selection on deleterious alleles. Population size is infinite in both simulations, and the starting frequency and the strength of selection are the same.
(a) Based on the shape of the curves, why do the results of the simulations differ? Explain your answer.
(b) The allele in the second simulation is not eliminated entirely from the population. Would this change if the population was finite in size? Why or why not?

A mosquito that has the genotype Ester1Ester1 is considered ____ and is ____ at the esterase locus.
The sickle-cell anemia allele, S, experiences strong negative selection because of its deleterious effect on homozygotes, yet the allele is maintained at frequencies higher than expected because having only one copy can increase survival in areas where malaria is prevalent. This is an example of
The graph below depicts the rise in resistance to warfarin in a rat population. Notice that after reaching a peak of 100% resistance, resistance in the population declined. Please provide a plausible evolutionary explanation for this. 

A bowl of beads has 500 red and 500 white beads. In a random sample of two beads, you select two white beads; if you took a random sample of 100 beads, you would expect
Which of the following is the best evidence for a genetic bottleneck in northern elephant seals?
If a population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and the frequency of homozygous recessive individuals is 0.49, what is the frequency of the recessive allele?
Although the Ester1 allele confers a selective advantage to mosquitoes exposed to DDT on the coast of France, carriers of Ester1 in inland populations are more likely to be caught by spiders and other predators. This is an example of
An example of a phenotype is _____, while a genotype would be _____.
How is a null hypothesis useful in studying how allele frequencies change?
How did Buri's experiments illustrate populations deviating from the assumptions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium?
In comparison with genetic drift, evolution by natural selection is
Which of the following is not an assumption of the Hardy-Weinberg theorem?
Discuss the effectiveness of genetic drift and natural selection in small versus large populations. Please be sure to explain why each process is stronger or weaker depending on the population size.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)