Exam 6: Set Theory

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

Consider the statement  For all sets A and B,(AB)B=\text { For all sets } A \text { and } B , ( A - B ) \cap B = \emptyset \text {. } Complete the proof begun below in which the given statement is derived algebraically from the properties listed in Theorem 6.2.2. Be sure to give a reason for every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step: Proof: Let AA and BB be any sets. Then the left-hand side of the equation to be shown is  Consider the statement  \text { For all sets } A \text { and } B , ( A - B ) \cap B = \emptyset \text {. }   Complete the proof begun below in which the given statement is derived algebraically from the properties listed in Theorem 6.2.2. Be sure to give a reason for every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step: Proof: Let  A  and  B  be any sets. Then the left-hand side of the equation to be shown is    which is the right-hand side of the equation to be shown. [Hence the given statement is true.] (The number of lines in the outline shown above works for one version of a proof. If you write a proof using more or fewer lines, be sure to follow the given format, supplying a reason for every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step.) which is the right-hand side of the equation to be shown. [Hence the given statement is true.] (The number of lines in the outline shown above works for one version of a proof. If you write a proof using more or fewer lines, be sure to follow the given format, supplying a reason for every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step.)

Free
(Essay)
5.0/5
(22)
Correct Answer:
Verified

Proof:
Let AA and BB be any sets. Then the left-hand side of the equation to be shown is
(AB)B=(ABc)B by the set difference law =A(BcB) by the associative law (for )=A(BBc) by the commutative law (for )=A by the complement law (for )= by the universal bound law (for )\begin{aligned}( A - B ) \cap B & = \left( A \cap B ^ { c } \right) \cap B & \text { by the set difference law } \\& = A \cap \left( B ^ { c } \cap B \right) & & \text { by the associative law (for } \cap ) \\& = A \cap \left( B \cap B ^ { c } \right) & & \text { by the commutative law (for } \cap ) \\& = A \cap \emptyset & & \text { by the complement law (for } \cap ) \\& = \emptyset & & \text { by the universal bound law (for } \cap )\end{aligned}
which is the right-hand side of the equation to be shown. [Hence the given statement is true.]

Use the element method for proving a set equals the empty set to prove that  For all sets A and C,(AC)(CA)=\text { For all sets } A \text { and } C , ( A - C ) \cap ( C - A ) = \emptyset \text {. }

Free
(Essay)
4.8/5
(36)
Correct Answer:
Verified

Element Proof: Suppose the given statement is false.
[We must show that this supposition leads logically to a contradiction.]
Then there exist sets AA and CC such that (AC)(CA)( A - C ) \cap ( C - A ) \neq \emptyset .
Thus there is an element, say xx , in (AC)(CA)( A - C ) \cap ( C - A ) .
By definition of intersection, xACx \in A - C and xCAx \in C - A .
By definition of set difference applied to both expressions, xAx \in A and xCx \notin C and xCx \in C and xAx \notin A .
Hence, in particular, xAx \in A and xAx \notin A , which is a contradiction.
[Arriving at this contradiction shows that the given statement is not false; so it is true that for all sets AA and B,(AC)(CA)=B , ( A - C ) \cap ( C - A ) = \emptyset .]

 Element Proof: Suppose the given statement is false. [We must show that this supposition leads logically to a contradiction.] Then there exist sets  A  and  C  such that  ( A - C ) \cap ( C - A ) \neq \emptyset . Thus there is an element, say  x , in  ( A - C ) \cap ( C - A ) . By definition of intersection,  x \in A - C  and  x \in C - A . By definition of set difference applied to both expressions,  x \in A  and  x \notin C  and  x \in C  and  x \notin A . Hence, in particular,  x \in A  and  x \notin A , which is a contradiction. [Arriving at this contradiction shows that the given statement is not false; so it is true that for all sets  A  and  B , ( A - C ) \cap ( C - A ) = \emptyset .]    Suppose the given statement is false. Then there exist sets  \bar { B }  and  C  such that  ( B - C ) - B \neq \emptyset .  Thus there is an element x in (B − C) − B. Applying the definition of set difference twice gives that  x \in B  and  x \notin C  and  x \notin B . Hence  x \in B  and  x \notin B , which is a contradiction [and so the given statement is true]. Suppose the given statement is false. Then there exist sets Bˉ\bar { B } and CC such that (BC)B( B - C ) - B \neq \emptyset .
Thus there is an element x in (B − C) − B. Applying the definition of set difference twice gives that xBx \in B and xCx \notin C and xBx \notin B . Hence xBx \in B and xBx \notin B , which is a contradiction [and so the given statement is true].

Fill in the blanks: (a) Given sets AA and BB , to prove that (AB)(AB)A( A - B ) \cup ( A \cap B ) \subseteq A , we suppose that xx \in _____and we must show that xx \in _____ (b) By definition of union, to say that x(AB)(AB)x \in ( A - B ) \cup ( A \cap B ) means that_____

Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(40)
Correct Answer:
Verified

a. (AB)(AB);A( A - B ) \cup ( A \cap B ) ; A
b. x(AB)x \in ( A - B ) or x(AB)x \in ( A \cap B )

Let X={lZl=5a+2X = \{ l \in \mathrm { Z } \mid l = 5 a + 2 for some integer a},Y={mZm=4b+3a \} , Y = \{ m \in \mathrm { Z } \mid m = 4 b + 3 for some integer b}b \} , and Z={nZn=4c1Z = \{ n \in \mathrm { Z } \mid n = 4 c - 1 for some integer c}c \} . (a) Is XYX \subseteq Y ? (b) Is YZY \subseteq Z ? Justify your answers carefully. (In other words, provide a proof if the statement is true or a disproof if the statement is false.)

(Essay)
4.9/5
(34)

 If X={u,v}, what is the power set of X?\text { If } X = \{ u , v \} , \text { what is the power set of } X ?

(Essay)
4.7/5
(37)

Write a negation for the following statement:  For all x, if xAB then xB\text { For all } x \text {, if } x \in A \cap B \text { then } x \in B \text {. }

(Essay)
4.8/5
(32)

Consider the statement  For all sets A and B,(AB)B=\text { For all sets } A \text { and } B , ( A - B ) \cap B = \emptyset \text {. } The proof below is the beginning of a proof using the element method for proving that the set equals the empty set. Complete the proof without using any of the set properties from Theorem 6.2.2. Proof: Suppose the given statement is false. Then there exist sets AA and BB such that (A( A - B)BB ) \cap B \neq \emptyset . Thus there is an element xx in (AB)B( A - B ) \cap B . By definition of intersection,...

(Essay)
4.9/5
(36)

Disprove the following statement by finding a counterexample.  For all sets A,B, and C,A(BC)(AB)C\text { For all sets } A , B \text {, and } C , A \cup ( B \cap C ) \subseteq ( A \cup B ) \cap C \text {. }

(Essay)
4.8/5
(31)

Is the following sentence a statement: This sentence is false or 22=4- 2 ^ { 2 } = 4 Justify your answer.

(Essay)
4.7/5
(34)

(a) Is 2{2,4,6}2 \subseteq \{ 2,4,6 \} ? (b) Is {3}{1,3,5}\{ 3 \} \in \{ 1,3,5 \} ?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(37)

Let A and B be sets. Define precisely (but concisely) what it means for A to be a subset of B.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(37)

Derive the following result. You may do so either "algebraically" using the properties listed in Theorem 6.2.2, being sure to give a reason for every step, or you may use the element method for proving a set equals the empty set.  For all sets B and C,(BC)B=\text { For all sets } B \text { and } C , ( B - C ) - B = \emptyset \text {. }

(Essay)
4.9/5
(37)

Define sets AA and BB as follows: A={nZn=8r3A = \{ n \in \mathbf { Z } \mid n = 8 r - 3 for some integer r}r \} and B={mZm=4s+1B = \{ m \in \mathbf { Z } \mid m = 4 s + 1 for some integer s}s \} . (a) Is ABA \subseteq B ? (b) Is BAB \subseteq A ? Justify your answers carefully. (In other words, provide a proof if the statement is true or a disproof if the statement is false.)

(Essay)
4.9/5
(24)

Prove the following statement using an element argument and reasoning directly from the definitions of union, intersection, set difference.  For all sets A,B, and C,(AB)CA(BC)\text { For all sets } A , B \text {, and } C , ( A \cup B ) \cap C \subseteq A \cup ( B \cap C ) \text {. }

(Essay)
4.7/5
(35)

Prove that for all sets AA and B1,B2,BnB _ { 1 } , B _ { 2 } , \ldots B _ { n } , Ai=1nBi=i=1n(ABi)A - \bigcap _ { i = 1 } ^ { n } B _ { i } = \bigcup _ { i = 1 } ^ { n } \left( A - B _ { i } \right)

(Essay)
4.8/5
(46)

(a) Prove the following statement using the element method for proving that a set equals the empty set: For all sets AA and B,A(BA)=B , A \cap ( B - A ) = \emptyset . (b) Use the properties in Theorem 6.2.26.2 .2 to prove the statement in part (a). Be sure to give a reason for every step.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(28)

Fill in the blanks in the following sentence: If A,BA , B and CC are any sets, then by definition of set difference xA(BC)x \in A - ( B \cap C ) if, and only if, xx ____ and xx ____

(Essay)
4.9/5
(37)

The following is an outline of a proof that (AB)cAcBc( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  Given sets AA and BB , to prove that (AB)cAcBc( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose xx \in  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  then we show that xx \in \ldots  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  . So suppose that  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  Then by definition of complement,  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( xx is in AA or xx is in BB ). Consequently, xx is not in AA  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  xx is not in BB because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that xAx \notin A and xBx \notin B . So by definition of complement, xx \in \ldots  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  and xx \in  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  Thus, by definition of intersection, xx \in  The following is an outline of a proof that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks.  Given sets  A  and  B , to prove that  ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose  x \in    then we show that  x \in \ldots    . So suppose that   Then by definition of complement,   So by definition of union, it is not the case that (  x  is in  A  or  x  is in  B  ). Consequently,  x  is not in  A    x  is not in  B  because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that  x \notin A  and  x \notin B . So by definition of complement,  x \in \ldots    and  x \in  Thus, by definition of intersection,  x \in   [as was to be shown].  [as was to be shown].

(Essay)
4.8/5
(28)

Derive the following result "algebraically" using the properties listed in Theorem 6.2.2. Give a reason for every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step.  For all sets A,B, and C,(AC)B=(AB)(CB)\text { For all sets } A , B \text {, and } C , ( A \cup C ) - B = ( A - B ) \cup ( C - B ) \text {. }

(Essay)
4.8/5
(36)
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)