Exam 6: Set Theory
Consider the statement
Complete the proof begun below in which the given statement is derived algebraically from
the properties listed in Theorem 6.2.2. Be sure to give a reason for every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step: Proof:
Let and be any sets. Then the left-hand side of the equation to be shown is
which is the right-hand side of the equation to be shown. [Hence the given statement is true.]
(The number of lines in the outline shown above works for one version of a proof. If you write
a proof using more or fewer lines, be sure to follow the given format, supplying a reason for
every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step.)
![Consider the statement \text { For all sets } A \text { and } B , ( A - B ) \cap B = \emptyset \text {. } Complete the proof begun below in which the given statement is derived algebraically from the properties listed in Theorem 6.2.2. Be sure to give a reason for every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step: Proof: Let A and B be any sets. Then the left-hand side of the equation to be shown is which is the right-hand side of the equation to be shown. [Hence the given statement is true.] (The number of lines in the outline shown above works for one version of a proof. If you write a proof using more or fewer lines, be sure to follow the given format, supplying a reason for every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step.)](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7d_690e_7730_8949_d193338e30ee_TB7212_11.jpg)
Proof:
Let and be any sets. Then the left-hand side of the equation to be shown is
which is the right-hand side of the equation to be shown. [Hence the given statement is true.]
Use the element method for proving a set equals the empty set to prove that
Element Proof: Suppose the given statement is false.
[We must show that this supposition leads logically to a contradiction.]
Then there exist sets and such that .
Thus there is an element, say , in .
By definition of intersection, and .
By definition of set difference applied to both expressions, and and and .
Hence, in particular, and , which is a contradiction.
[Arriving at this contradiction shows that the given statement is not false; so it is true that for all sets and .] Suppose the given statement is false. Then there exist sets and such that .
Thus there is an element x in (B − C) − B. Applying the definition of set difference twice gives that and and . Hence and , which is a contradiction [and so the given statement is true].
Fill in the blanks: (a) Given sets and , to prove that , we suppose that _____and we must show that _____
(b) By definition of union, to say that means that_____
a.
b. or
Let for some integer for some integer , and for some integer .
(a) Is ?
(b) Is ?
Justify your answers carefully. (In other words, provide a proof if the statement is true or a disproof if the statement is false.)
Consider the statement
The proof below is the beginning of a proof using the element method for proving that the
set equals the empty set. Complete the proof without using any of the set properties from
Theorem 6.2.2. Proof: Suppose the given statement is false. Then there exist sets and such that . Thus there is an element in . By definition of intersection,...
Is the following sentence a statement: This sentence is false or Justify your answer.
Let A and B be sets. Define precisely (but concisely) what it means for A to be a subset of B.
Derive the following result. You may do so either "algebraically" using the properties listed in
Theorem 6.2.2, being sure to give a reason for every step, or you may use the element method
for proving a set equals the empty set.
Define sets and as follows: for some integer and for some integer .
(a) Is ?
(b) Is ?
Justify your answers carefully. (In other words, provide a proof if the statement is true or a disproof if the statement is false.)
Prove the following statement using an element argument and reasoning directly from the
definitions of union, intersection, set difference.
(a) Prove the following statement using the element method for proving that a set equals the empty set: For all sets and .
(b) Use the properties in Theorem to prove the statement in part (a). Be sure to give a reason for every step.
Fill in the blanks in the following sentence: If and are any sets, then by definition of set difference if, and only if, ____ and ____
The following is an outline of a proof that . Fill in the blanks.
Given sets and , to prove that , we suppose
then we show that
. So suppose that
Then by definition of complement,
So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( is in or is in ). Consequently, is not in
is not in because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that and . So by definition of complement,
and
Thus, by definition of intersection,
[as was to be shown].
![The following is an outline of a proof that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks. Given sets A and B , to prove that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose x \in then we show that x \in \ldots . So suppose that Then by definition of complement, So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( x is in A or x is in B ). Consequently, x is not in A x is not in B because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that x \notin A and x \notin B . So by definition of complement, x \in \ldots and x \in Thus, by definition of intersection, x \in [as was to be shown].](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7c_f3f9_5227_8949_293b551a853c_TB7212_11.jpg)
![The following is an outline of a proof that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks. Given sets A and B , to prove that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose x \in then we show that x \in \ldots . So suppose that Then by definition of complement, So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( x is in A or x is in B ). Consequently, x is not in A x is not in B because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that x \notin A and x \notin B . So by definition of complement, x \in \ldots and x \in Thus, by definition of intersection, x \in [as was to be shown].](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7c_fcff_0b38_8949_7d269d49db19_TB7212_11.jpg)
![The following is an outline of a proof that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks. Given sets A and B , to prove that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose x \in then we show that x \in \ldots . So suppose that Then by definition of complement, So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( x is in A or x is in B ). Consequently, x is not in A x is not in B because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that x \notin A and x \notin B . So by definition of complement, x \in \ldots and x \in Thus, by definition of intersection, x \in [as was to be shown].](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7d_0974_2179_8949_c1859324f4d2_TB7212_11.jpg)
![The following is an outline of a proof that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks. Given sets A and B , to prove that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose x \in then we show that x \in \ldots . So suppose that Then by definition of complement, So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( x is in A or x is in B ). Consequently, x is not in A x is not in B because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that x \notin A and x \notin B . So by definition of complement, x \in \ldots and x \in Thus, by definition of intersection, x \in [as was to be shown].](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7d_198f_836a_8949_871004fafcaf_TB7212_11.jpg)
![The following is an outline of a proof that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks. Given sets A and B , to prove that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose x \in then we show that x \in \ldots . So suppose that Then by definition of complement, So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( x is in A or x is in B ). Consequently, x is not in A x is not in B because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that x \notin A and x \notin B . So by definition of complement, x \in \ldots and x \in Thus, by definition of intersection, x \in [as was to be shown].](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7d_2472_12cb_8949_7b15a0fbec34_TB7212_11.jpg)
![The following is an outline of a proof that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks. Given sets A and B , to prove that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose x \in then we show that x \in \ldots . So suppose that Then by definition of complement, So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( x is in A or x is in B ). Consequently, x is not in A x is not in B because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that x \notin A and x \notin B . So by definition of complement, x \in \ldots and x \in Thus, by definition of intersection, x \in [as was to be shown].](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7d_2cbf_032c_8949_c18c5818ce16_TB7212_11.jpg)
![The following is an outline of a proof that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks. Given sets A and B , to prove that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose x \in then we show that x \in \ldots . So suppose that Then by definition of complement, So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( x is in A or x is in B ). Consequently, x is not in A x is not in B because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that x \notin A and x \notin B . So by definition of complement, x \in \ldots and x \in Thus, by definition of intersection, x \in [as was to be shown].](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7d_3538_33ad_8949_15b1c59e0b34_TB7212_11.jpg)
![The following is an outline of a proof that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks. Given sets A and B , to prove that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose x \in then we show that x \in \ldots . So suppose that Then by definition of complement, So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( x is in A or x is in B ). Consequently, x is not in A x is not in B because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that x \notin A and x \notin B . So by definition of complement, x \in \ldots and x \in Thus, by definition of intersection, x \in [as was to be shown].](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7d_4267_722e_8949_8ddffa007d39_TB7212_11.jpg)
![The following is an outline of a proof that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } . Fill in the blanks. Given sets A and B , to prove that ( A \cup B ) ^ { c } \subseteq A ^ { c } \cap B ^ { c } , we suppose x \in then we show that x \in \ldots . So suppose that Then by definition of complement, So by definition of union, it is not the case that ( x is in A or x is in B ). Consequently, x is not in A x is not in B because of De Morgan's law of logic. In symbols, this says that x \notin A and x \notin B . So by definition of complement, x \in \ldots and x \in Thus, by definition of intersection, x \in [as was to be shown].](https://storage.examlex.com/TB7212/11eccf7d_4cda_01af_8949_274f37fede4c_TB7212_11.jpg)
Derive the following result "algebraically" using the properties listed in Theorem 6.2.2. Give
a reason for every step that exactly justifies what was done in the step.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)