Exam 13: Multiple Parties and Teams in Negotiation

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

During the information management phase of multiparty negotiations,scouts represent a formal link to some important constituency and help to acquire resources the group needs to continue to operate.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(36)

According to Mulvey,Veiga,and Elsass,what are the most common reasons why group members give up rather than continuing to participate in the group discussion?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(44)

Remember that the person who does the ____________ often has more power than others,because he or she gets to ____________ the agreement in his or her own language and may bias or selectively remember some points and omit others.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(33)

Conflict is a natural part of group life that improves members' ability to complete tasks,work together,and sustain these relationships.

(True/False)
4.7/5
(44)

When a chairperson is also advocating a particular position or preferred outcome,it will be difficult for that individual to act or be seen as "neutral."

(True/False)
4.8/5
(35)

In multiparty negotiations,multiple parties are negotiating together to achieve a ____________ objective or group consensus.

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(32)

In a competitive negotiation,parties are likely to use information ____________-sharing very little with other parties,while attempting to gain much information from others.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(41)

Negotiators who have some way to control the number of parties at the table may begin to strategically manipulate this control to serve their objectives.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(34)

When a team negotiates against a solo negotiator,these positive benefits of team negotiation do not occur.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(32)

____________ of multiparty negotiations must be sensitive to keeping tight control over the group process while not directly affecting the group's outcome.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(42)

What is the result of procedural complexity in multiparty negotiations?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(30)

One of the most fundamental consequences of increasing the number of parties in a negotiation is that

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(28)

When a group wants to achieve a consensus or unanimous decision,the responsibility of the chair is to be constantly attentive to the group process.Identify which of the pointers below for how to chair a multiparty negotiation effectively is not correct.

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(27)

Which of the following questions should not be asked as part of the requirements for building a relationship in the connect model?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(45)

Many complex international negotiations devote a great deal of time to the question of just who will be recognized and who can speak for others.The issue about participants can be decided by asking which of the following questions?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(38)

What does research show about interteam negotiations versus solo negotiations?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(41)

The prenegotiation phase of multilateral negotiations

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)

Describe a few of the many reasons why an agenda can be an effective decision aid.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(35)

If the group has been through a great deal of divisive and unproductive conflict to reach the first agreement,then the renegotiations do not have to specifically attend to changing and managing the conflict process.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(39)

The drawback,of course,is that many group members may be satisfied with the first solution-either because it already incorporates their views or because the difficulty of achieving it may sap their ____________ for exerting any time and energy to improve it.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(38)
Showing 21 - 40 of 60
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)