Exam 10: Data Mining

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description,regression results,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,ten of whom are doing very well Group 1)and ten who are not Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description,regression results,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,ten of whom are doing very well Group 1)and ten who are not Group 2).      Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different. Group Centroids Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 610.7 605.7   \text { Classitication Matrix }   \begin{array}{cccc}  \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \% \text { correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 1 & 90.00 \% \\ && & 0 & \\ \text { Group2 }&  2 &8 & 1 & 80.00 \% \\ &  &  & 0 & \\\\ \text { Total } & 1 & 9& 2 & 85.00 \%\\ &1&&0  \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1.What percentage of the observations is classified correctly?  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description,regression results,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,ten of whom are doing very well Group 1)and ten who are not Group 2).      Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different. Group Centroids Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 610.7 605.7   \text { Classitication Matrix }   \begin{array}{cccc}  \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \% \text { correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 1 & 90.00 \% \\ && & 0 & \\ \text { Group2 }&  2 &8 & 1 & 80.00 \% \\ &  &  & 0 & \\\\ \text { Total } & 1 & 9& 2 & 85.00 \%\\ &1&&0  \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1.What percentage of the observations is classified correctly? Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different. Group Centroids Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 610.7 605.7  Classitication Matrix \text { Classitication Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 1 90.00\% 0 Group2 2 8 1 80.00\% 0 Total 1 9 2 85.00\% 1 0  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description,regression results,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,ten of whom are doing very well Group 1)and ten who are not Group 2).      Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different. Group Centroids Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 610.7 605.7   \text { Classitication Matrix }   \begin{array}{cccc}  \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \% \text { correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 1 & 90.00 \% \\ && & 0 & \\ \text { Group2 }&  2 &8 & 1 & 80.00 \% \\ &  &  & 0 & \\\\ \text { Total } & 1 & 9& 2 & 85.00 \%\\ &1&&0  \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1.What percentage of the observations is classified correctly? -Refer to Exhibit 10.1.What percentage of the observations is classified correctly?

(Multiple Choice)
5.0/5
(36)

Plots useful in data mining analysis can be accessed in Excel using the add-in

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(32)

Affinity analysis is a data mining technique that attempts to discover

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(44)

Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description,regression results,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,ten of whom are doing very well Group 1)and ten who are not Group 2).  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description,regression results,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,ten of whom are doing very well Group 1)and ten who are not Group 2).      Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different. Group Centroids Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 610.7 605.7   \text { Classitication Matrix }   \begin{array}{cccc}  \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \% \text { correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 1 & 90.00 \% \\ && & 0 & \\ \text { Group2 }&  2 &8 & 1 & 80.00 \% \\ &  &  & 0 & \\\\ \text { Total } & 1 & 9& 2 & 85.00 \%\\ &1&&0  \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1.Suppose that for a given observation,the difference between Mahalanobis distances between group 1 and 2 G1-G2)is big and positive.This means that  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description,regression results,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,ten of whom are doing very well Group 1)and ten who are not Group 2).      Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different. Group Centroids Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 610.7 605.7   \text { Classitication Matrix }   \begin{array}{cccc}  \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \% \text { correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 1 & 90.00 \% \\ && & 0 & \\ \text { Group2 }&  2 &8 & 1 & 80.00 \% \\ &  &  & 0 & \\\\ \text { Total } & 1 & 9& 2 & 85.00 \%\\ &1&&0  \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1.Suppose that for a given observation,the difference between Mahalanobis distances between group 1 and 2 G1-G2)is big and positive.This means that Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different. Group Centroids Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 610.7 605.7  Classitication Matrix \text { Classitication Matrix } Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Total \% correct Group1 9 1 1 90.00\% 0 Group2 2 8 1 80.00\% 0 Total 1 9 2 85.00\% 1 0  Exhibit 10.1 The following questions are based on the problem description,regression results,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful or not-successful in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,ten of whom are doing very well Group 1)and ten who are not Group 2).      Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different. Group Centroids Group Quantitative Verbal 1 683.8 654.2 2 610.7 605.7   \text { Classitication Matrix }   \begin{array}{cccc}  \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Total } & \% \text { correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 9 & 1 & 1 & 90.00 \% \\ && & 0 & \\ \text { Group2 }&  2 &8 & 1 & 80.00 \% \\ &  &  & 0 & \\\\ \text { Total } & 1 & 9& 2 & 85.00 \%\\ &1&&0  \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.1.Suppose that for a given observation,the difference between Mahalanobis distances between group 1 and 2 G1-G2)is big and positive.This means that -Refer to Exhibit 10.1.Suppose that for a given observation,the difference between Mahalanobis distances between group 1 and 2 G1-G2)is big and positive.This means that

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(43)

Logistic regression in XLMiner add-in can be used for groups

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)

In the k nearest neighbor technique,a large value of k produces classifications that

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(40)

When purity is perfect,the Gini index is equal to

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(32)

The Fisher linear discriminant function

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)

Suppose that the correlation coefficient between X1 and X2 is equal to -1.This means that

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(39)

A test sample is often used to perform of how well the model will work with new data

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(32)

Suppose that an analyst classified a new record using the following sequential steps i)find identical records in the training sample,ii)determine a group,to which majority of these records belong,iii)assign the new record to the group in step ii).This technique is called

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)

Mahalanobis distance is a measure of

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(39)

In hierarchical clustering,the measure of similarity between clusters is/are

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(36)

In the k nearest neighbor technique,a small value of k produces classifications that are

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(31)

Neural networks technique attempts to learn

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(46)

Exhibit 10.2 The following questions are based on the problem description,spreadsheet,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful Group 1),marginally successful Group 2)or not- successful Group 3)in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,7 successful Group 1),6 marginally successful Group 2)and 7 not successful Group 3).  Exhibit 10.2 The following questions are based on the problem description,spreadsheet,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful Group 1),marginally successful Group 2)or not- successful Group 3)in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,7 successful Group 1),6 marginally successful Group 2)and 7 not successful Group 3).    Discriminant Analysis Report October 1,2013 4:22:38 PM Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different.   \begin{array}{lll} \text {Group}\\ \text { Centroids}\\ \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 697.7142857 & 650.4285714 \\ 2 & 647.8571429 & 630.7142857 \\ 3 & 5876666667 & 6051666667 \end{array}    \text {Group}   \text {Frenuencies}   \begin{array}{cr} \text { Group } & \begin{array}{r} \text { Relative } \\ \text { Frequency } \end{array} \\ \hline 1 & 35.00 \% \\ 2 & 35.00 \% \\ 3 & 30.00\% \end{array}   Training Sample Classification Mahalanobis Distances     \text {Classification}   \text {Matrix}   \begin{array}{llllll} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group3 } & \text { Total } & \% \text { correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 6 & 1 & 0 & 7 & 85.71 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 7 & 0 & 7 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Group3 } & 0 & 0 & 6 & 6 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total } & 6 & 8 & 6 & 2 & 95.00 \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.2.What is the quantitative test score value of the group centroid for group 2? Discriminant Analysis Report October 1,2013 4:22:38 PM Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different. Group Centroids Group Quantitative Verbal 1 697.7142857 650.4285714 2 647.8571429 630.7142857 3 5876666667 6051666667 Group\text {Group} Frenuencies\text {Frenuencies} Group Relative Frequency 1 35.00\% 2 35.00\% 3 30.00\% Training Sample Classification Mahalanobis Distances  Exhibit 10.2 The following questions are based on the problem description,spreadsheet,and the Analytic Solver Platform Discriminant Analysis report below. A college admissions officer wants to evaluate graduate school applicants based on their GMAT scores,verbal and quantitative.Students are classified as either successful Group 1),marginally successful Group 2)or not- successful Group 3)in their graduate studies.The officer has data on 20 current students,7 successful Group 1),6 marginally successful Group 2)and 7 not successful Group 3).    Discriminant Analysis Report October 1,2013 4:22:38 PM Unpooled Estimates of within-group Covariance matrices are used,assuming they are different.   \begin{array}{lll} \text {Group}\\ \text { Centroids}\\ \text { Group } & \text { Quantitative } & \text { Verbal } \\ \hline 1 & 697.7142857 & 650.4285714 \\ 2 & 647.8571429 & 630.7142857 \\ 3 & 5876666667 & 6051666667 \end{array}    \text {Group}   \text {Frenuencies}   \begin{array}{cr} \text { Group } & \begin{array}{r} \text { Relative } \\ \text { Frequency } \end{array} \\ \hline 1 & 35.00 \% \\ 2 & 35.00 \% \\ 3 & 30.00\% \end{array}   Training Sample Classification Mahalanobis Distances     \text {Classification}   \text {Matrix}   \begin{array}{llllll} \text { Actual / Predicted } & \text { Group1 } & \text { Group2 } & \text { Group3 } & \text { Total } & \% \text { correct } \\ \hline \text { Group1 } & 6 & 1 & 0 & 7 & 85.71 \% \\ \text { Group2 } & 0 & 7 & 0 & 7 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Group3 } & 0 & 0 & 6 & 6 & 100.00 \% \\ \text { Total } & 6 & 8 & 6 & 2 & 95.00 \% \end{array}    -Refer to Exhibit 10.2.What is the quantitative test score value of the group centroid for group 2? Classification\text {Classification} Matrix\text {Matrix} Actual / Predicted Group1 Group2 Group3 Total \% correct Group1 6 1 0 7 85.71\% Group2 0 7 0 7 100.00\% Group3 0 0 6 6 100.00\% Total 6 8 6 2 95.00\% -Refer to Exhibit 10.2.What is the quantitative test score value of the group centroid for group 2?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)

In the step of data mining,a researcher attempts to estimate to which discrete group an observation belongs to

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(34)

Affinity analysis is a data mining technique used in marketing research to determine

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(38)

Cluster analysis is a data mining technique used for

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(43)

Useful data mining techniques can be found in Excel under drop menu

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(42)
Showing 81 - 100 of 102
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)