Exam 13: Section 1: Peer Relationship

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
  • Select Tags

Describe the association between being sociometrically popular and being perceived as popular by one's peers. In what ways are these similar and in what ways are they different? Do you think this association changes developmentally? Be specific and provide supportive examples.

Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(30)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The association between being sociometrically popular and being perceived as popular by one's peers is complex and can vary depending on the social dynamics of a particular group. Sociometric popularity refers to the extent to which an individual is liked or accepted by their peers within a specific social group, as measured by sociometric methods such as peer nominations or ratings. On the other hand, perceived popularity refers to the subjective perception of an individual's popularity by their peers, which may be influenced by factors such as social status, attractiveness, or social skills.

In some ways, sociometric popularity and perceived popularity are similar in that they both involve the recognition and acceptance of an individual within a social group. Both concepts are also related to an individual's social standing and influence within their peer group. However, they can also differ in that sociometric popularity is based on objective measures of peer acceptance, while perceived popularity is based on subjective perceptions and may be influenced by factors beyond just likability, such as social status or physical appearance.

Developmentally, the association between sociometric and perceived popularity may change as individuals mature and their social relationships become more complex. For example, in early childhood, sociometric popularity may be closely aligned with perceived popularity, as children may base their perceptions of others' popularity on observable behaviors and likability. However, as children enter adolescence, the association between sociometric and perceived popularity may become more nuanced, as factors such as social status, physical attractiveness, and social skills play a larger role in shaping perceptions of popularity.

Supportive examples of this developmental change can be seen in research on adolescent social dynamics, which has found that perceived popularity becomes more closely tied to factors such as social status and physical attractiveness, rather than just likability, as individuals navigate the complexities of peer relationships during this developmental stage. Additionally, longitudinal studies have shown that the association between sociometric and perceived popularity may fluctuate over time, as individuals' social standing and influence within their peer group evolve.

In conclusion, the association between being sociometrically popular and being perceived as popular by one's peers is multifaceted and can change developmentally. While both concepts involve peer acceptance and social standing, they can differ in their underlying factors and may become more complex as individuals mature. Understanding the nuances of this association is important for gaining insight into the social dynamics of peer relationships and the development of social competence.

Describe three similarities and three differences between caregiver‒child relationships and children's friendships. Be sure to discuss the qualities of the relationships as well as what those relationships provide for the children involved.

Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(38)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Caregiver-child relationships and children's friendships share some similarities, but also have distinct differences.

Similarities:
1. Emotional support: Both caregiver-child relationships and children's friendships provide emotional support for the children involved. Caregivers offer love, comfort, and reassurance, while friends offer companionship, empathy, and understanding.
2. Trust and security: Both relationships provide a sense of trust and security for the children. Caregivers create a safe and stable environment for the child, while friends offer a sense of belonging and acceptance.
3. Influence on development: Both relationships play a significant role in the child's development. Caregivers help shape the child's values, beliefs, and behaviors, while friends contribute to the child's social and emotional development through peer interactions and shared experiences.

Differences:
1. Power dynamics: Caregiver-child relationships typically involve a power imbalance, with the caregiver having authority over the child. In contrast, children's friendships are more egalitarian, with both parties having equal say in the relationship.
2. Duration and intensity: Caregiver-child relationships are long-term and deeply influential, as caregivers are responsible for the child's overall well-being. Friendships, on the other hand, can be more transient and may not have the same level of impact on the child's overall development.
3. Role and responsibility: Caregivers have a primary responsibility for meeting the child's physical, emotional, and developmental needs, while friends provide companionship, social interaction, and shared experiences without the same level of responsibility.

In summary, both caregiver-child relationships and children's friendships offer emotional support, trust, and influence on development for the children involved. However, they differ in terms of power dynamics, duration and intensity, and role and responsibility within the relationship. Both types of relationships are important for a child's overall well-being and social development.

Imagine observing a group of preschoolers playing in their classroom. How would one be able to differentiate between pairs of children who were friends and those who were not friends? Can these relationships be considered true friendships? Why or why not?

Free
(Essay)
4.9/5
(33)
Correct Answer:
Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

Observing a group of preschoolers playing in their classroom, one could differentiate between pairs of children who were friends and those who were not friends by looking for certain behaviors and interactions. Friends may engage in cooperative play, share toys and materials, show empathy and concern for each other, and seek each other out for social interaction. They may also display signs of affection, such as hugging or holding hands. On the other hand, children who are not friends may play independently or parallel to each other, show little interest in each other's activities, and may even display signs of conflict or competition.

These relationships can be considered true friendships, even at a young age, if they involve mutual affection, cooperation, and support. While preschoolers may not have the same level of understanding and depth in their friendships as older children or adults, they are still capable of forming meaningful connections with their peers. These friendships can provide important social and emotional support for young children as they navigate the complexities of social interactions and develop their own identities. Therefore, it is important to recognize and nurture these early friendships in the preschool classroom.

Describe two ways in which children's active participation in their choice of friends and in their friendships can be associated with child outcomes. Be specific and provide examples.

(Essay)
5.0/5
(35)

Define sociometric status and describe how it is typically assessed. What are the five basic acceptance classifications used by researchers, and how are children classified into each of these categories?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(32)

Describe peer victimization and its association with rejection. In which direction does the association go? Provide supportive examples.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(35)

Research has indicated an association between secure attachment in infancy and later positive peer relationships. First, briefly describe this association. Second, make the argument that this association is a causal one-that secure attachments cause children to have positive peer relationships. Third, make the opposite argument-that sociable, likeable children tend to elicit both positive parenting and positive peer relationships.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(35)

Describe how cultural beliefs influence children's peer relations. Be sure to think about children's opportunities for peer relations as well as cultural beliefs about how children should behave when they are with their peers.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(37)

Do you believe the sex differences in children's friendships that have been identified in psychological research have an impact on the benefits and costs of the friendships for the children involved? Be specific and provide supportive examples.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(33)

Describe the protective function that friendships can provide to children. Be specific and provide supportive examples.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(38)

Describe how children's friendship conceptions change from preschool age to school age to adolescence. Be specific and provide supportive examples.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(44)

A teacher is asked by a school principal to help two 1st-grade children who are having problems with their peers. The first child, April, has a number of children who like her, but also a number of children who really do not like her. The second child, Danny, is quite aggressive and is consequently rejected by his peers. Describe three things that the teacher could do to try to help each of these children get along better with their peers.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(39)

Describe the relation between aggression and sociometric status. Do all aggressive children fall into the same status group? If so, why? If not, what causes aggressive children to be classified differently?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(32)

Does the crowd in which an adolescent is considered to be a member have an impact on the development of his or her identity, or does an adolescent's identity cause him or her to be considered a member of a particular crowd? Be specific and provide supportive examples.

(Not Answered)
This question doesn't have any answer yet
Ask our community

Describe two ways in which the friendships of school-age boys and those of school-age girls are similar and two ways in which they are different. Knowing about these similarities and differences, make a prediction about how girls' and boys' friendships protect them from difficult circumstances. Be specific and explain why you would make this prediction.

(Essay)
4.8/5
(34)

Compare and contrast the positive effects of being well liked by one's peers and of having supportive friendships. Do you think success in one of these areas can make up for failure in the other area? Why or why not?

(Essay)
4.8/5
(38)

Describe the long-term outcomes for children who are categorized as sociometrically rejected and as sociometrically popular. In what ways is a child's peer status caused by the child's behaviour, and in what ways is a child's behaviour caused by his or her peer status? Provide supportive examples.

(Essay)
4.9/5
(40)

Describe the relation between withdrawn behaviour and sociometric status. Do all withdrawn children fall into the same status group? If so, why? If not, what causes withdrawn children to be classified differently?

(Essay)
4.9/5
(37)

Describe the nature of middle-childhood cliques. What purposes do they serve for children at this age? How do cliques change as children move into early adolescence? How do they change as individuals move into late adolescence?

(Not Answered)
This question doesn't have any answer yet
Ask our community
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)