Exam 13: Multiple Regression

SCENARIO 13-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixth- grade proficiency test.She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X1 = Salaries and X 2 = Spending: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.4276 R Square 0.1828 Adjusted R Square 0.1457 Standard Error 5.7351 Observations 47 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 323.8284 161.9142 4.9227 0.0118 Residual 44 1447.2094 32.8911 Total 46 1771.0378 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept -72.9916 45.9106 -1.5899 0.1190 -165.5184 19.5352 Salary 2.7939 0.8974 3.1133 0.0032 0.9853 4.6025 Spending 0.3742 0.9782 0.3825 0.7039 -1.5972 2.3455 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-15, what is the value of the test statistic to determine whether there is a significant relationship between percentage of students passing the proficiency test and the entire set of explanatory variables?

SCENARIO 13-4 A real estate builder wishes to determine how house size (House) is influenced by family income (Income) and family size (Size).House size is measured in hundreds of square feet and income is measured in thousands of dollars.The builder randomly selected 50 families and ran the multiple regression.Partial Microsoft Excel output is provided below: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.8479 R Square 0.7189 Adjusted R Square 0.7069 Standard Error 17.5571 Observations 50 $\text { ANOVA }$ df SS MS F Significance F Regression 37043.3236 18521.6618 0.0000 Residual 14487.7627 308.2503 Total 49 51531.0863 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept -5.5146 7.2273 -0.7630 0.4493 Income 0.4262 0.0392 10.8668 0.0000 Size 5.5437 1.6949 3.2708 0.0020 $\text { Also } \operatorname{SSR}\left(X_{1} \mid X_{2}\right)=36400.6326 \text { and } \operatorname{SSR}\left(X_{2} \mid X_{1}\right)=3297.7917$ -Referring to SCENARIO 13-4, the partial F test forH0: Variable X1 does not significantly improve the model after variable X2 has been includedH1: Variable X1 significantly improves the model after variable X2 has been included has and degrees of freedom.

A regression had the following results: SST = 102.55, SSE = 82.04.It can be said that 20.0% of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by the independent variables in the regression.

SCENARIO 13-18 A logistic regression model was estimated in order to predict the probability that a randomly chosen university or college would be a private university using information on mean total Scholastic Aptitude Test score (SAT) at the university or college and whether the TOEFL criterion is at least 90 (Toefl90 = 1 if yes, 0 otherwise.) The dependent variable, Y, is school type (Type = 1 if private and 0 otherwise).There are 80 universities in the sample. The PHStat output is given below: Binary Logistic Regression Predictor Coefficients SE Coef Z p -Value Intercept -3.9594 1.6741 -2.3650 0.0180 SAT 0.0028 0.0011 2.5459 0.0109 Toefl90:1 0.1928 0.5827 0.3309 0.7407 Deviance 101.9826 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-18, what should be the decision ('reject' or 'do not reject') on the null hypothesis when testing whether SAT makes a significant contribution to the model in the presence of Toefl90 at a 0.05 level of significance?

SCENARIO 13-5 A microeconomist wants to determine how corporate sales are influenced by capital and wage spending by companies.She proceeds to randomly select 26 large corporations and record information in millions of dollars.The Microsoft Excel output below shows results of this multiple regression. SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.830 R Square 0.689 Adjusted R Square 0.662 Standard Error 17501.643 Observations 26 ANOVA df SS MS F Signif F Regression 2 15579777040 7789888520 25.432 0.0001 Residual 23 7045072780 306307512 Total 25 22624849820 Coeff StdError t Stat P-value Intercept 15800.0000 6038.2999 2.617 0.0154 Capital 0.1245 0.2045 0.609 0.5485 Wages 7.0762 1.4729 4.804 0.0001 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-5, what is the p-value for testing whether Wages have a positive impact on corporate sales?

When an explanatory variable is dropped from a multiple regression model, the adjusted r 2 can increase.

SCENARIO 13-15 The superintendent of a school district wanted to predict the percentage of students passing a sixth- grade proficiency test.She obtained the data on percentage of students passing the proficiency test (% Passing), mean teacher salary in thousands of dollars (Salaries), and instructional spending per pupil in thousands of dollars (Spending) of 47 schools in the state. Following is the multiple regression output with Y = % Passing as the dependent variable, X1 = Salaries and X 2 = Spending: Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.4276 R Square 0.1828 Adjusted R Square 0.1457 Standard Error 5.7351 Observations 47 ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F Regression 2 323.8284 161.9142 4.9227 0.0118 Residual 44 1447.2094 32.8911 Total 46 1771.0378 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95\% Upper 95\% Intercept -72.9916 45.9106 -1.5899 0.1190 -165.5184 19.5352 Salary 2.7939 0.8974 3.1133 0.0032 0.9853 4.6025 Spending 0.3742 0.9782 0.3825 0.7039 -1.5972 2.3455 -Referring to SCENARIO 13-15, the null hypothesis should be rejected at a 5% level of significance when testing whether mean teacher salary has any effect on percentage of students passing the proficiency test, considering the effect of instructional spending per pupil.