Exam 4: Making Arguments for Association and Causality
Exam 1: Introduction to Communication Research24 Questions
Exam 2: Three Paradigms of Knowing24 Questions
Exam 3: Ethics and Research23 Questions
Exam 4: Making Arguments for Association and Causality24 Questions
Exam 5: Measuring and Designing Quantitative Social Science Research24 Questions
Exam 6: Experimental Research: Predicting Causes and Effects20 Questions
Exam 7: Survey Research: Explaining and Predicting Attitudes and Behaviors24 Questions
Exam 8: Content Analysis: Explaining and Interpreting Message Categories23 Questions
Exam 9: Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data21 Questions
Exam 10: Conversation Analysis: Explaining Talks Structure and Function22 Questions
Exam 11: Making Arguments for Multiple Plausible Realities22 Questions
Exam 12: Interview and Focus Groups: Interpreting Guided Responses23 Questions
Exam 13: Ethnography: Interpreting and Evaluating Cultural Communication23 Questions
Exam 14: Discourse Analysis: Interpreting Evaluating Language-In-Use23 Questions
Exam 15: Rhetorical Criticism: How to Interpret Persuasive Texts and Artifacts24 Questions
Exam 16: Critical Studies: Evaluating and Reforming Ideologies24 Questions
Select questions type
In one study, participants filled an instrument in which several items were used to measure interpersonal competence to see if responses on these items were similar. This assessed what form of reliability?
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(41)
The list that a researcher uses to locate all the elements in a population, and from which sample elements will be selected, is called a
(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(36)
Using a panel of judges to validate your variable definitions is a procedure that helps to establish
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)
Showing 21 - 24 of 24
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)