Chat with AIExam 12: Interview and Focus Groups: Interpreting Guided Responses
Exam 1: Introduction to Communication Research24 Questions
Exam 2: Three Paradigms of Knowing24 Questions
Exam 3: Ethics and Research23 Questions
Exam 4: Making Arguments for Association and Causality24 Questions
Exam 5: Measuring and Designing Quantitative Social Science Research24 Questions
Exam 6: Experimental Research: Predicting Causes and Effects20 Questions
Exam 7: Survey Research: Explaining and Predicting Attitudes and Behaviors24 Questions
Exam 8: Content Analysis: Explaining and Interpreting Message Categories23 Questions
Exam 9: Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data21 Questions
Exam 10: Conversation Analysis: Explaining Talks Structure and Function22 Questions
Exam 11: Making Arguments for Multiple Plausible Realities22 Questions
Exam 12: Interview and Focus Groups: Interpreting Guided Responses23 Questions
Exam 13: Ethnography: Interpreting and Evaluating Cultural Communication23 Questions
Exam 14: Discourse Analysis: Interpreting Evaluating Language-In-Use23 Questions
Exam 15: Rhetorical Criticism: How to Interpret Persuasive Texts and Artifacts24 Questions
Exam 16: Critical Studies: Evaluating and Reforming Ideologies24 Questions
Select questions type
When analyzing focus group data, a researcher notices that several people expressed the same idea but using different words. The researcher records this pattern as a:
(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5 
(38)
(38) Discuss how you can increase your credibility as an interview/focus group researcher and how you can ensure that your findings and interpretations are plausible to others.
(Essay)
4.7/5 (35)
(35) 
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)