Exam 8: Knowledge Sharing Systems
The IT and KM communities are debating "pull" versus "push" technologies. A pull technology is one in which the user must actively request a document or information in order to receive it and frequently involves searching for information. Push technologies provide information for the user automatically, without being requested to do so. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of pull versus push technologies for knowledge sharing.
Some of the criteria for success of knowledge sharing systems are the active presentation of relevant information, collection of information from various sources, and fitting in to the standard workflow. Pull versus push technologies may be evaluated with regard to these two criteria. Pull technologies are useful for allowing a user to actively search for information at a time when the information is needed. Further more, pull technologies enable users to filter and evaluate the success of their information search strategies, which can lead to more efficient searches in the future. However, a user may not be aware of possible information resources and would not know to go looking to pull from these resources. Furthermore, depending on the extent of integration with existing workflow and technologies, the pull process may be outside of the normal workflow and thus negatively impact the user's performance. Push technologies require an understanding of the user's information needs at various times, which is currently very difficult to anticipate and as such may miss opportunities to provide relevant problem solving information. Push technologies are able however to find relevant information from across all organizational explicit knowledge resources. Push technologies should also be integrated well into the standard workflow and thus be less disruptive to the user's performance. Another drawback of push technologies is the means used to determine if information is relevant for pushing to a user, typically done through some type of keyword or concept mapping. Push technologies can actually cause information overload by pushing information that was thought to be relevant, but turns out not to be.
Lessons learned systems are a new knowledge technology and have not yet been widely implemented.
False
Knowledge sharing systems will be used and produce ROI for any type of organizational culture.
False
Many knowledge management systems integrate a collection of various IT tools.
Which of the following is not a way to collect lessons for a lessons learned system?
Which of the following is not a characteristic of knowledge owners in a knowledge sharing system?
What are the potential differences between the specific knowledge sharing system types?
Which of the following is not considered as a crucial requirement for the success of a knowledge sharing system in industry?
User feedback can be used to help keep knowledge fresh and relevant.
Lessons learned always demonstrate a solution to a negative experience.
What is the type of dissemination when lessons from a lessons learned system are disseminated throughout an entire organization after they are stored in the system?
Why is the WWW considered to be the standard communications medium for modern KM applications?
Best practices databases and Lessons-learned systems are examples of knowledge sharing systems.
Knowledge owners typically share their knowledge altruistically.
Knowledge sharing systems are designed to help users share their tacit and explicit knowledge.
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)