Exam 20: How Do Groups Intensify Decisions
A false impression of what other people are thinking,feeling or responding is what social psychologists call
C
view of how groupthink symptoms contributed to the Iraq war.
Groupthink symptoms played a significant role in contributing to the Iraq war. Groupthink occurs when a group of people prioritize harmony and consensus over critical thinking and rational decision-making. In the case of the Iraq war, there were several symptoms of groupthink that were evident.
Firstly, there was a strong pressure for conformity within the group of policymakers and advisors involved in the decision to go to war. Dissenting opinions were often dismissed or ignored, leading to a lack of diverse perspectives being considered in the decision-making process.
Secondly, there was an illusion of invulnerability among the group, leading them to underestimate the potential risks and consequences of their actions. This led to an overly optimistic view of the potential outcomes of the war, without fully considering the potential negative impacts.
Thirdly, there was a belief in the inherent morality of the group's actions, leading to a justification of the war based on moral or ethical grounds rather than a thorough and objective assessment of the situation.
Finally, there was a collective rationalization of the group's decisions, with members downplaying or ignoring evidence that contradicted their beliefs and justifications for going to war.
Overall, these symptoms of groupthink contributed to a lack of critical evaluation and consideration of alternative perspectives, ultimately leading to the decision to go to war in Iraq. This highlights the dangers of groupthink in the context of important decision-making processes, particularly in matters of national security and international relations.
According to social comparison theory,we are most persuaded by
B
The text suggests that the extremism of terrorist organizations,such as those involved in the September 11th attacks on the United States,is very likely the result of the naturally occurring process of
organized groups of prejudiced and nonprejudiced high school students and asked them to respond to issues involving racial attitudes,both before and after group discussion.Results showed that after within-group discussion,_______ became _______.
You are hesitant to ask questions in class because you assume everyone else understands and you would therefore seem foolish.Your thinking best exemplifies
Evaluating one's opinions and abilities by comparing oneself to others is called
Which of the following is a comment you are LEAST likely to hear being made within a group characterized by groupthink?
The fact that people associate mostly with others whose attitudes are similar to their own,suggests the prevalence of naturally occurring
Individuals who believe that physician-assisted suicides should be legalized meet to discuss the issue.Research on group interaction suggests that after the discussion the individuals will be
Which of the following comments is most likely to be made in a group characterized by groupthink?
Julio is a directive leader of a highly cohesive student group on campus.When discussing important policy decisions,the group will be at greatest risk for groupthink if it is also
The fact that active participation in discussion produces more polarization is best explained by
suggested that the Internet is an effective means to rally like-minded people and mobilize lethal consequences,such as recruiting individuals for terror organizations.Which concept in social psychology best explains this trend?
Maggie favors the death penalty.In discussing this issue with some like-minded classmates,she hears arguments for this position that she has never considered before.After the discussion,her opinion is more extreme.This outcome is best explained by
According to the text,groupthink symptoms can be viewed as a form of dissonance reduction as group members
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)