Exam 16: Time-Series Forecasting

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

TABLE 16-8 The manager of a marketing consulting firm has been examining his company's yearly profits. He believes that these profits have been showing a quadratic trend since 1990. He uses Microsoft Excel to obtain the partial output below. The dependent variable is profit (in thousands of dollars), while the independent variables are coded years and squared of coded years, where 1990 is coded as 0, 1991 is coded as 1, etc. SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.998 R Square 0.996 Adjusted R Square 0.996 Standard Error 4.996 Observations 17 Coefficients Intercept 35.5 Coded Year 0.45 Year Squared 1.00 -Referring to Table 16-8, the fitted value for 1995 is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(37)

TABLE 16-12 A local store developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast its revenues in future quarters, using quarterly data on its revenues during the 4-year period from 2005 to 2009. The following is the resulting regression equation: log₁₀ Y^\hat Y = 6.102 + 0.012 X - 0.129 Q₁ - 0.054 Q₂ + 0.098 Q₃ where Y^\hat Y is the estimated number of contracts in a quarter. X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0 in the first quarter of 2005. Q₁ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₂ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₃ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. -Referring to Table 16-12, the best interpretation of the coefficient of Q₃ (0.098)in the regression equation is

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(37)

TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year. Month Retail Sales 1 6,594 2 6,610 3 8,174 4 9,513 5 10,595 6 10,415 7 9,949 8 9,810 9 9,637 10 9,732 11 9,214 12 9,201 The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:  Linear trend model: \text { Linear trend model: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 7950.7564 617.6342 12.8729 0.0000 Coded Month 212.6503 95.1145 2.2357 0.0494 Quadratic trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6358.2473 417.2692 15.2378 0.0000 Coded Month 1168.1558 176.3526 6.6240 0.0001 Coded Month 2 -86.8641 15.4474 -5.6232 0.0003 Exponential trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3.8912 0.0315 123.3674 0.0000 Coded Month 0.0116 0.0049 2.3957 0.0376  First-order autoregressive: \text { First-order autoregressive: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3132.0951 1287.2899 2.4331 0.0378 YLag1 0.6823 0.1398 4.8812 0.0009 Second-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept 4968.5789 766.9416 6.4784 0.0003 YLag1 0.9333 0.1547 6.0316 0.0005 YLag2 -0.4487 0.1238 -3.6235 0.0085 Third-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6782.7567 2105.7115 3.2211 0.0234 YLag1 0.5481 0.3918 1.3990 0.2207 YLag2 0.0198 0.4034 0.0490 0.9628 YLag3 -0.2749 0.2234 -1.2308 0.2731 Below is the residual plot of the various models:  TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year.   \begin{array}{l} \text { Month Retail Sales }\\ \begin{array} { | c | c | }  \hline 1 & 6,594 \\ \hline 2 & 6,610 \\ \hline 3 & 8,174 \\ \hline 4 & 9,513 \\ \hline 5 & 10,595 \\ \hline 6 & 10,415 \\ \hline 7 & 9,949 \\ \hline 8 & 9,810 \\ \hline 9 & 9,637 \\ \hline 10 & 9,732 \\ \hline 11 & 9,214 \\ \hline 12 & 9,201 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}   The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:   \text { Linear trend model: }   \begin{array} { | l | r | r | r | r | }  \hline &   { \text { Coefficients } } & \text { Standard Error } &  { t \text { Stat } } &  { \text { P-value } } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 7950.7564 & 617.6342 & 12.8729 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 212.6503 & 95.1145 & 2.2357 & 0.0494 \\ \hline \end{array}     Quadratic trend model:  \begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &  {t \text { Stat }} &  {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6358.2473 & 417.2692 & 15.2378 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 1168.1558 & 176.3526 & 6.6240 & 0.0001 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month 2 } & -86.8641 & 15.4474 & -5.6232 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \end{array}   Exponential trend model:  \begin{array}{|lrrrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3.8912 & 0.0315 & 123.3674 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 0.0116 & 0.0049 & 2.3957 & 0.0376 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { First-order autoregressive: }   \begin{array}{|l|r|rrr|} \hline & {\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} & {t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3132.0951 & 1287.2899 & 2.4331 & 0.0378 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.6823 & 0.1398 & 4.8812 & 0.0009 \\ \hline \end{array}     Second-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{lrrrr} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & \text { Standard Error } &{\text { t Stat }} & {P \text {-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 4968.5789 & 766.9416 & 6.4784 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.9333 & 0.1547 & 6.0316 & 0.0005 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & -0.4487 & 0.1238 & -3.6235 & 0.0085 \\ \hline \end{array}   Third-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{|l|rrrr|} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6782.7567 & 2105.7115 & 3.2211 & 0.0234 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.5481 & 0.3918 & 1.3990 & 0.2207 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & 0.0198 & 0.4034 & 0.0490 & 0.9628 \\ \hline \text { YLag3 } & -0.2749 & 0.2234 & -1.2308 & 0.2731 \\ \hline \end{array}  Below is the residual plot of the various models:     -Referring to Table 16-13, the best model based on the residual plots is the second-order autoregressive model. -Referring to Table 16-13, the best model based on the residual plots is the second-order autoregressive model.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)

When using the exponentially weighted moving average for purposes of forecasting rather than smoothing,

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(46)

The method of moving averages is used

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(43)

TABLE 16-14 A contractor developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast the number of contracts in future quarters, using quarterly data on number of contracts during the 3-year period from 2008 to 2010. The following is the resulting regression equation: ln Ŷ = 3.37 + 0.117 X - 0.083 Q₁ + 1.28 Q₂ + 0.617 Q₃ where Ŷ is the estimated number of contracts in a quarter X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0 in the first quarter of 2008. Q₁ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₂ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₃ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. -Referring to Table 16-14, to obtain a forecast for the first quarter of 2011 using the model, which of the following sets of values should be used in the regression equation?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(33)

The method of least squares is used on time-series data for

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)

TABLE 16-3 The following table contains the number of complaints received in a department store for the first 6 months of last year. Month Complaints January 36 February 45 March 81 April 90 May 108 June 144 -Referring to Table 16-3, if this series is smoothed using exponential smoothing with a smoothing constant of 1/3, what would be the first value?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(37)

TABLE 16-5 The number of passengers arriving at San Francisco on the Amtrak cross-country express on 6 successive Mondays were: 60, 72, 96, 84, 36, and 48. -Referring to Table 16-5, the number of arrivals will be exponentially smoothed with a smoothing constant of 0.25. The smoothed value for the second Monday will be ________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(36)

TABLE 16-10 Business closures in Laramie, Wyoming from 2005 to 2010 were: 2005 10 2006 11 2007 13 2008 19 2009 24 2010 35 Microsoft Excel was used to fit both first-order and second-order autoregressive models, resulting in the following partial outputs: SUMMARY OUTPUT - 2nd Order Model Coefficient Intercept -5.77 X Variable 1 0.80 X Variable 2 1.14 SUMMARY OUTPUT - 1 st Order Model Coefficients Intercept -4.16 X Variable 1 1.59 -Referring to Table 16-10, the residuals for the first-order autoregressive model are ________, ________, ________, ________, and ________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(38)

TABLE 16-3 The following table contains the number of complaints received in a department store for the first 6 months of last year. Month Complaints January 36 February 45 March 81 April 90 May 108 June 144 -Referring to Table 16-3, suppose the last two smoothed values are 81 and 96 (Note: they are not). What would you forecast as the value of the time series for September?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(40)

TABLE 16-11 The manager of a health club has recorded mean attendance in newly introduced step classes over the last 15 months: 32.1, 39.5, 40.3, 46.0, 65.2, 73.1, 83.7, 106.8, 118.0, 133.1, 163.3, 182.8, 205.6, 249.1, and 263.5. She then used Microsoft Excel to obtain the following partial output for both a first- and second-order autoregressive model. SUMMARY OUTPUT - 2nd Order Model Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.993 R Square 0.987 Adjusted R Square 0.985 Standard Error 9.276 Observations 15 Coefficients Intercept 5.86 X Variable 1 0.37 X Variable 2 0.85 SUMMARY OUTPUT - 1 st Order Model Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.993 R Square 0.987 Adjusted R Square 0.985 Standard Error 9.150 Observations 15 Coefficients Intercept 5.66 X Variable 1 1.10 -Referring to Table 16-11, using the second-order model, the forecast of mean attendance for month 17 is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(35)

TABLE 16-4 The number of cases of merlot wine sold by a Paso Robles winery in an 8-year period follows. Year Cases of Wine 2003 270 2004 356 2005 398 2006 456 2007 358 2008 500 2009 410 2010 376 -Referring to Table 16-4, exponential smoothing with a weight or smoothing constant of 0.2 will be used to smooth the wine sales. The value of E₄, the smoothed value for 2006 is ________.

(Short Answer)
5.0/5
(35)

TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year. Month Retail Sales 1 6,594 2 6,610 3 8,174 4 9,513 5 10,595 6 10,415 7 9,949 8 9,810 9 9,637 10 9,732 11 9,214 12 9,201 The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:  Linear trend model: \text { Linear trend model: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 7950.7564 617.6342 12.8729 0.0000 Coded Month 212.6503 95.1145 2.2357 0.0494 Quadratic trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6358.2473 417.2692 15.2378 0.0000 Coded Month 1168.1558 176.3526 6.6240 0.0001 Coded Month 2 -86.8641 15.4474 -5.6232 0.0003 Exponential trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3.8912 0.0315 123.3674 0.0000 Coded Month 0.0116 0.0049 2.3957 0.0376  First-order autoregressive: \text { First-order autoregressive: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3132.0951 1287.2899 2.4331 0.0378 YLag1 0.6823 0.1398 4.8812 0.0009 Second-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept 4968.5789 766.9416 6.4784 0.0003 YLag1 0.9333 0.1547 6.0316 0.0005 YLag2 -0.4487 0.1238 -3.6235 0.0085 Third-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6782.7567 2105.7115 3.2211 0.0234 YLag1 0.5481 0.3918 1.3990 0.2207 YLag2 0.0198 0.4034 0.0490 0.9628 YLag3 -0.2749 0.2234 -1.2308 0.2731 Below is the residual plot of the various models:  TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year.   \begin{array}{l} \text { Month Retail Sales }\\ \begin{array} { | c | c | }  \hline 1 & 6,594 \\ \hline 2 & 6,610 \\ \hline 3 & 8,174 \\ \hline 4 & 9,513 \\ \hline 5 & 10,595 \\ \hline 6 & 10,415 \\ \hline 7 & 9,949 \\ \hline 8 & 9,810 \\ \hline 9 & 9,637 \\ \hline 10 & 9,732 \\ \hline 11 & 9,214 \\ \hline 12 & 9,201 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}   The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:   \text { Linear trend model: }   \begin{array} { | l | r | r | r | r | }  \hline &   { \text { Coefficients } } & \text { Standard Error } &  { t \text { Stat } } &  { \text { P-value } } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 7950.7564 & 617.6342 & 12.8729 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 212.6503 & 95.1145 & 2.2357 & 0.0494 \\ \hline \end{array}     Quadratic trend model:  \begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &  {t \text { Stat }} &  {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6358.2473 & 417.2692 & 15.2378 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 1168.1558 & 176.3526 & 6.6240 & 0.0001 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month 2 } & -86.8641 & 15.4474 & -5.6232 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \end{array}   Exponential trend model:  \begin{array}{|lrrrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3.8912 & 0.0315 & 123.3674 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 0.0116 & 0.0049 & 2.3957 & 0.0376 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { First-order autoregressive: }   \begin{array}{|l|r|rrr|} \hline & {\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} & {t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3132.0951 & 1287.2899 & 2.4331 & 0.0378 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.6823 & 0.1398 & 4.8812 & 0.0009 \\ \hline \end{array}     Second-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{lrrrr} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & \text { Standard Error } &{\text { t Stat }} & {P \text {-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 4968.5789 & 766.9416 & 6.4784 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.9333 & 0.1547 & 6.0316 & 0.0005 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & -0.4487 & 0.1238 & -3.6235 & 0.0085 \\ \hline \end{array}   Third-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{|l|rrrr|} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6782.7567 & 2105.7115 & 3.2211 & 0.0234 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.5481 & 0.3918 & 1.3990 & 0.2207 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & 0.0198 & 0.4034 & 0.0490 & 0.9628 \\ \hline \text { YLag3 } & -0.2749 & 0.2234 & -1.2308 & 0.2731 \\ \hline \end{array}  Below is the residual plot of the various models:     -Referring to Table 16-13, what is the value of the t test statistic for testing the appropriateness of the second-order autoregressive model? -Referring to Table 16-13, what is the value of the t test statistic for testing the appropriateness of the second-order autoregressive model?

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(33)

TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year. Month Retail Sales 1 6,594 2 6,610 3 8,174 4 9,513 5 10,595 6 10,415 7 9,949 8 9,810 9 9,637 10 9,732 11 9,214 12 9,201 The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:  Linear trend model: \text { Linear trend model: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 7950.7564 617.6342 12.8729 0.0000 Coded Month 212.6503 95.1145 2.2357 0.0494 Quadratic trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6358.2473 417.2692 15.2378 0.0000 Coded Month 1168.1558 176.3526 6.6240 0.0001 Coded Month 2 -86.8641 15.4474 -5.6232 0.0003 Exponential trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3.8912 0.0315 123.3674 0.0000 Coded Month 0.0116 0.0049 2.3957 0.0376  First-order autoregressive: \text { First-order autoregressive: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3132.0951 1287.2899 2.4331 0.0378 YLag1 0.6823 0.1398 4.8812 0.0009 Second-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept 4968.5789 766.9416 6.4784 0.0003 YLag1 0.9333 0.1547 6.0316 0.0005 YLag2 -0.4487 0.1238 -3.6235 0.0085 Third-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6782.7567 2105.7115 3.2211 0.0234 YLag1 0.5481 0.3918 1.3990 0.2207 YLag2 0.0198 0.4034 0.0490 0.9628 YLag3 -0.2749 0.2234 -1.2308 0.2731 Below is the residual plot of the various models:  TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year.   \begin{array}{l} \text { Month Retail Sales }\\ \begin{array} { | c | c | }  \hline 1 & 6,594 \\ \hline 2 & 6,610 \\ \hline 3 & 8,174 \\ \hline 4 & 9,513 \\ \hline 5 & 10,595 \\ \hline 6 & 10,415 \\ \hline 7 & 9,949 \\ \hline 8 & 9,810 \\ \hline 9 & 9,637 \\ \hline 10 & 9,732 \\ \hline 11 & 9,214 \\ \hline 12 & 9,201 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}   The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:   \text { Linear trend model: }   \begin{array} { | l | r | r | r | r | }  \hline &   { \text { Coefficients } } & \text { Standard Error } &  { t \text { Stat } } &  { \text { P-value } } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 7950.7564 & 617.6342 & 12.8729 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 212.6503 & 95.1145 & 2.2357 & 0.0494 \\ \hline \end{array}     Quadratic trend model:  \begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &  {t \text { Stat }} &  {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6358.2473 & 417.2692 & 15.2378 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 1168.1558 & 176.3526 & 6.6240 & 0.0001 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month 2 } & -86.8641 & 15.4474 & -5.6232 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \end{array}   Exponential trend model:  \begin{array}{|lrrrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3.8912 & 0.0315 & 123.3674 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 0.0116 & 0.0049 & 2.3957 & 0.0376 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { First-order autoregressive: }   \begin{array}{|l|r|rrr|} \hline & {\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} & {t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3132.0951 & 1287.2899 & 2.4331 & 0.0378 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.6823 & 0.1398 & 4.8812 & 0.0009 \\ \hline \end{array}     Second-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{lrrrr} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & \text { Standard Error } &{\text { t Stat }} & {P \text {-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 4968.5789 & 766.9416 & 6.4784 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.9333 & 0.1547 & 6.0316 & 0.0005 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & -0.4487 & 0.1238 & -3.6235 & 0.0085 \\ \hline \end{array}   Third-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{|l|rrrr|} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6782.7567 & 2105.7115 & 3.2211 & 0.0234 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.5481 & 0.3918 & 1.3990 & 0.2207 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & 0.0198 & 0.4034 & 0.0490 & 0.9628 \\ \hline \text { YLag3 } & -0.2749 & 0.2234 & -1.2308 & 0.2731 \\ \hline \end{array}  Below is the residual plot of the various models:     -Referring to Table 16-13, what is your forecast for the 13ᵗʰ month using the quadratic-trend model? -Referring to Table 16-13, what is your forecast for the 13ᵗʰ month using the quadratic-trend model?

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(43)

TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year. Month Retail Sales 1 6,594 2 6,610 3 8,174 4 9,513 5 10,595 6 10,415 7 9,949 8 9,810 9 9,637 10 9,732 11 9,214 12 9,201 The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:  Linear trend model: \text { Linear trend model: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 7950.7564 617.6342 12.8729 0.0000 Coded Month 212.6503 95.1145 2.2357 0.0494 Quadratic trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6358.2473 417.2692 15.2378 0.0000 Coded Month 1168.1558 176.3526 6.6240 0.0001 Coded Month 2 -86.8641 15.4474 -5.6232 0.0003 Exponential trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3.8912 0.0315 123.3674 0.0000 Coded Month 0.0116 0.0049 2.3957 0.0376  First-order autoregressive: \text { First-order autoregressive: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3132.0951 1287.2899 2.4331 0.0378 YLag1 0.6823 0.1398 4.8812 0.0009 Second-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept 4968.5789 766.9416 6.4784 0.0003 YLag1 0.9333 0.1547 6.0316 0.0005 YLag2 -0.4487 0.1238 -3.6235 0.0085 Third-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6782.7567 2105.7115 3.2211 0.0234 YLag1 0.5481 0.3918 1.3990 0.2207 YLag2 0.0198 0.4034 0.0490 0.9628 YLag3 -0.2749 0.2234 -1.2308 0.2731 Below is the residual plot of the various models:  TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year.   \begin{array}{l} \text { Month Retail Sales }\\ \begin{array} { | c | c | }  \hline 1 & 6,594 \\ \hline 2 & 6,610 \\ \hline 3 & 8,174 \\ \hline 4 & 9,513 \\ \hline 5 & 10,595 \\ \hline 6 & 10,415 \\ \hline 7 & 9,949 \\ \hline 8 & 9,810 \\ \hline 9 & 9,637 \\ \hline 10 & 9,732 \\ \hline 11 & 9,214 \\ \hline 12 & 9,201 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}   The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:   \text { Linear trend model: }   \begin{array} { | l | r | r | r | r | }  \hline &   { \text { Coefficients } } & \text { Standard Error } &  { t \text { Stat } } &  { \text { P-value } } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 7950.7564 & 617.6342 & 12.8729 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 212.6503 & 95.1145 & 2.2357 & 0.0494 \\ \hline \end{array}     Quadratic trend model:  \begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &  {t \text { Stat }} &  {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6358.2473 & 417.2692 & 15.2378 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 1168.1558 & 176.3526 & 6.6240 & 0.0001 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month 2 } & -86.8641 & 15.4474 & -5.6232 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \end{array}   Exponential trend model:  \begin{array}{|lrrrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3.8912 & 0.0315 & 123.3674 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 0.0116 & 0.0049 & 2.3957 & 0.0376 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { First-order autoregressive: }   \begin{array}{|l|r|rrr|} \hline & {\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} & {t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3132.0951 & 1287.2899 & 2.4331 & 0.0378 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.6823 & 0.1398 & 4.8812 & 0.0009 \\ \hline \end{array}     Second-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{lrrrr} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & \text { Standard Error } &{\text { t Stat }} & {P \text {-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 4968.5789 & 766.9416 & 6.4784 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.9333 & 0.1547 & 6.0316 & 0.0005 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & -0.4487 & 0.1238 & -3.6235 & 0.0085 \\ \hline \end{array}   Third-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{|l|rrrr|} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6782.7567 & 2105.7115 & 3.2211 & 0.0234 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.5481 & 0.3918 & 1.3990 & 0.2207 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & 0.0198 & 0.4034 & 0.0490 & 0.9628 \\ \hline \text { YLag3 } & -0.2749 & 0.2234 & -1.2308 & 0.2731 \\ \hline \end{array}  Below is the residual plot of the various models:     -Referring to Table 16-13, what is the exponentially smoothed value for the second month using a smoothing coefficient of W = 0.5? -Referring to Table 16-13, what is the exponentially smoothed value for the second month using a smoothing coefficient of W = 0.5?

(Short Answer)
4.7/5
(35)

TABLE 16-3 The following table contains the number of complaints received in a department store for the first 6 months of last year. Month Complaints January 36 February 45 March 81 April 90 May 108 June 144 -If you want to recover the trend using exponential smoothing, you will choose a weight (W)that falls in the range

(Multiple Choice)
4.7/5
(42)

A least squares linear trend line is just a simple regression line with the years recoded.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)

TABLE 16-4 The number of cases of merlot wine sold by a Paso Robles winery in an 8-year period follows. Year Cases of Wine 2003 270 2004 356 2005 398 2006 456 2007 358 2008 500 2009 410 2010 376 -Referring to Table 16-4, exponential smoothing with a weight or smoothing constant of 0.4 will be used to smooth the wine sales. The value of E₂, the smoothed value for 2004 is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(32)

TABLE 16-5 The number of passengers arriving at San Francisco on the Amtrak cross-country express on 6 successive Mondays were: 60, 72, 96, 84, 36, and 48. -Referring to Table 16-5, the number of arrivals will be smoothed with a 3-term moving average. There will be a total of ________ smoothed values.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(39)
Showing 61 - 80 of 168
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)