Exam 16: Time-Series Forecasting

arrow
  • Select Tags
search iconSearch Question
flashcardsStudy Flashcards
  • Select Tags

Given a data set with 15 yearly observations, there are only seven 9-year moving averages.

(True/False)
4.9/5
(31)

TABLE 16-3 The following table contains the number of complaints received in a department store for the first 6 months of last year. Month Complaints January 36 February 45 March 81 April 90 May 108 June 144 -Referring to Table 16-3, if this series is smoothed using exponential smoothing with a smoothing constant of 1/3, what would be the third value?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(35)

TABLE 16-8 The manager of a marketing consulting firm has been examining his company's yearly profits. He believes that these profits have been showing a quadratic trend since 1990. He uses Microsoft Excel to obtain the partial output below. The dependent variable is profit (in thousands of dollars), while the independent variables are coded years and squared of coded years, where 1990 is coded as 0, 1991 is coded as 1, etc. SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.998 R Square 0.996 Adjusted R Square 0.996 Standard Error 4.996 Observations 17 Coefficients Intercept 35.5 Coded Year 0.45 Year Squared 1.00 -Referring to Table 16-8, the forecast for profits in 2010 is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(32)

TABLE 16-7 The executive vice-president of a drug manufacturing firm believes that the demand for the firm's most popular drug has been evidencing an exponential trend since 1995. She uses Microsoft Excel to obtain the partial output below. The dependent variable is the log base 10 of the demand for the drug, while the independent variable is years, where 1995 is coded as 0, 1996 is coded as 1, etc. SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.996 R Square 0.992 Adjusted R Square 0.991 Standard Error 0.02831 Observations 12 Coefficients Intercept 1.44 Coded Year 0.068 -Referring to Table 16-7, the forecast for the demand in 2009 is ________.

(Short Answer)
5.0/5
(44)

TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year. Month Retail Sales 1 6,594 2 6,610 3 8,174 4 9,513 5 10,595 6 10,415 7 9,949 8 9,810 9 9,637 10 9,732 11 9,214 12 9,201 The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:  Linear trend model: \text { Linear trend model: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 7950.7564 617.6342 12.8729 0.0000 Coded Month 212.6503 95.1145 2.2357 0.0494 Quadratic trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6358.2473 417.2692 15.2378 0.0000 Coded Month 1168.1558 176.3526 6.6240 0.0001 Coded Month 2 -86.8641 15.4474 -5.6232 0.0003 Exponential trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3.8912 0.0315 123.3674 0.0000 Coded Month 0.0116 0.0049 2.3957 0.0376  First-order autoregressive: \text { First-order autoregressive: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3132.0951 1287.2899 2.4331 0.0378 YLag1 0.6823 0.1398 4.8812 0.0009 Second-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept 4968.5789 766.9416 6.4784 0.0003 YLag1 0.9333 0.1547 6.0316 0.0005 YLag2 -0.4487 0.1238 -3.6235 0.0085 Third-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6782.7567 2105.7115 3.2211 0.0234 YLag1 0.5481 0.3918 1.3990 0.2207 YLag2 0.0198 0.4034 0.0490 0.9628 YLag3 -0.2749 0.2234 -1.2308 0.2731 Below is the residual plot of the various models:  TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year.   \begin{array}{l} \text { Month Retail Sales }\\ \begin{array} { | c | c | }  \hline 1 & 6,594 \\ \hline 2 & 6,610 \\ \hline 3 & 8,174 \\ \hline 4 & 9,513 \\ \hline 5 & 10,595 \\ \hline 6 & 10,415 \\ \hline 7 & 9,949 \\ \hline 8 & 9,810 \\ \hline 9 & 9,637 \\ \hline 10 & 9,732 \\ \hline 11 & 9,214 \\ \hline 12 & 9,201 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}   The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:   \text { Linear trend model: }   \begin{array} { | l | r | r | r | r | }  \hline &   { \text { Coefficients } } & \text { Standard Error } &  { t \text { Stat } } &  { \text { P-value } } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 7950.7564 & 617.6342 & 12.8729 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 212.6503 & 95.1145 & 2.2357 & 0.0494 \\ \hline \end{array}     Quadratic trend model:  \begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &  {t \text { Stat }} &  {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6358.2473 & 417.2692 & 15.2378 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 1168.1558 & 176.3526 & 6.6240 & 0.0001 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month 2 } & -86.8641 & 15.4474 & -5.6232 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \end{array}   Exponential trend model:  \begin{array}{|lrrrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3.8912 & 0.0315 & 123.3674 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 0.0116 & 0.0049 & 2.3957 & 0.0376 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { First-order autoregressive: }   \begin{array}{|l|r|rrr|} \hline & {\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} & {t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3132.0951 & 1287.2899 & 2.4331 & 0.0378 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.6823 & 0.1398 & 4.8812 & 0.0009 \\ \hline \end{array}     Second-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{lrrrr} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & \text { Standard Error } &{\text { t Stat }} & {P \text {-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 4968.5789 & 766.9416 & 6.4784 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.9333 & 0.1547 & 6.0316 & 0.0005 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & -0.4487 & 0.1238 & -3.6235 & 0.0085 \\ \hline \end{array}   Third-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{|l|rrrr|} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6782.7567 & 2105.7115 & 3.2211 & 0.0234 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.5481 & 0.3918 & 1.3990 & 0.2207 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & 0.0198 & 0.4034 & 0.0490 & 0.9628 \\ \hline \text { YLag3 } & -0.2749 & 0.2234 & -1.2308 & 0.2731 \\ \hline \end{array}  Below is the residual plot of the various models:     -Referring to Table 16-13, you can conclude that the third-order autoregressive model is appropriate at the 5% level of significance. -Referring to Table 16-13, you can conclude that the third-order autoregressive model is appropriate at the 5% level of significance.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(33)

TABLE 16-5 The number of passengers arriving at San Francisco on the Amtrak cross-country express on 6 successive Mondays were: 60, 72, 96, 84, 36, and 48. -Referring to Table 16-5, exponentially smooth the number of arrivals using a smoothing constant of 0.1.

(Essay)
4.7/5
(26)

A second-order autoregressive model for average mortgage rate is: Rateᵢ = - 2.0 + 1.8(Rate)ᵢ₋₁ - 0.5 (Rate)ᵢ₋₂. If the average mortgage rate in 2010 was 7.0, and in 2009 was 6.4, the forecast for 2012 is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(40)

TABLE 16-12 A local store developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast its revenues in future quarters, using quarterly data on its revenues during the 4-year period from 2005 to 2009. The following is the resulting regression equation: log₁₀ Y^\hat Y = 6.102 + 0.012 X - 0.129 Q₁ - 0.054 Q₂ + 0.098 Q₃ where Y^\hat Y is the estimated number of contracts in a quarter. X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0 in the first quarter of 2005. Q₁ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₂ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₃ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. -Referring to Table 16-12, using the regression equation, what is the forecast for the revenues in the fourth quarter of 2011?

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(46)

TABLE 16-14 A contractor developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast the number of contracts in future quarters, using quarterly data on number of contracts during the 3-year period from 2008 to 2010. The following is the resulting regression equation: ln Ŷ = 3.37 + 0.117 X - 0.083 Q₁ + 1.28 Q₂ + 0.617 Q₃ where Ŷ is the estimated number of contracts in a quarter X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0 in the first quarter of 2008. Q₁ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₂ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₃ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. -Referring to Table 16-14, the best interpretation of the constant 3.37 in the regression equation is

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(34)

TABLE 16-5 The number of passengers arriving at San Francisco on the Amtrak cross-country express on 6 successive Mondays were: 60, 72, 96, 84, 36, and 48. -Referring to Table 16-5, the number of arrivals will be smoothed with a 3-term moving average. The last smoothed value will be ________.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(33)

TABLE 16-14 A contractor developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast the number of contracts in future quarters, using quarterly data on number of contracts during the 3-year period from 2008 to 2010. The following is the resulting regression equation: ln Ŷ = 3.37 + 0.117 X - 0.083 Q₁ + 1.28 Q₂ + 0.617 Q₃ where Ŷ is the estimated number of contracts in a quarter X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0 in the first quarter of 2008. Q₁ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₂ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₃ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. -Referring to Table 16-14, in testing the coefficient for Q₁ in the regression equation (-0.083), the results were a t-statistic of -0.66 and an associated p-value of 0.530. Which of the following is the best interpretation of this result?

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(36)

TABLE 16-4 The number of cases of merlot wine sold by a Paso Robles winery in an 8-year period follows. Year Cases of Wine 2003 270 2004 356 2005 398 2006 456 2007 358 2008 500 2009 410 2010 376 -Referring to Table 16-4, a centered 5-year moving average is to be constructed for the wine sales. The moving average for 2008 is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(38)

The manager of a company believed that her company's profits were following an exponential trend. She used Microsoft Excel to obtain a prediction equation for the logarithm (base 10)of profits: log₁₀(Profits)= 2 + 0.3X The data she used were from 2005 through 2010 coded 0 to 5. The forecast for 2011 profits is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(39)

TABLE 16-3 The following table contains the number of complaints received in a department store for the first 6 months of last year. Month Complaints January 36 February 45 March 81 April 90 May 108 June 144 -Referring to Table 16-3, if a three-month moving average is used to smooth this series, how many values would it have?

(Multiple Choice)
4.9/5
(41)

Given a data set with 15 yearly observations, a 3-year moving average will have fewer observations than a 5-year moving average.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(34)

TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year. Month Retail Sales 1 6,594 2 6,610 3 8,174 4 9,513 5 10,595 6 10,415 7 9,949 8 9,810 9 9,637 10 9,732 11 9,214 12 9,201 The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:  Linear trend model: \text { Linear trend model: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 7950.7564 617.6342 12.8729 0.0000 Coded Month 212.6503 95.1145 2.2357 0.0494 Quadratic trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6358.2473 417.2692 15.2378 0.0000 Coded Month 1168.1558 176.3526 6.6240 0.0001 Coded Month 2 -86.8641 15.4474 -5.6232 0.0003 Exponential trend model: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3.8912 0.0315 123.3674 0.0000 Coded Month 0.0116 0.0049 2.3957 0.0376  First-order autoregressive: \text { First-order autoregressive: } Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 3132.0951 1287.2899 2.4331 0.0378 YLag1 0.6823 0.1398 4.8812 0.0009 Second-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P -value Intercept 4968.5789 766.9416 6.4784 0.0003 YLag1 0.9333 0.1547 6.0316 0.0005 YLag2 -0.4487 0.1238 -3.6235 0.0085 Third-order autoregressive:: Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Intercept 6782.7567 2105.7115 3.2211 0.0234 YLag1 0.5481 0.3918 1.3990 0.2207 YLag2 0.0198 0.4034 0.0490 0.9628 YLag3 -0.2749 0.2234 -1.2308 0.2731 Below is the residual plot of the various models:  TABLE 16-13 Given below is the monthly time-series data for U.S. retail sales of building materials over a specific year.   \begin{array}{l} \text { Month Retail Sales }\\ \begin{array} { | c | c | }  \hline 1 & 6,594 \\ \hline 2 & 6,610 \\ \hline 3 & 8,174 \\ \hline 4 & 9,513 \\ \hline 5 & 10,595 \\ \hline 6 & 10,415 \\ \hline 7 & 9,949 \\ \hline 8 & 9,810 \\ \hline 9 & 9,637 \\ \hline 10 & 9,732 \\ \hline 11 & 9,214 \\ \hline 12 & 9,201 \\ \hline \end{array} \end{array}   The results of the linear trend, quadratic trend, exponential trend, first-order autoregressive, second-order autoregressive and third-order autoregressive model are presented below in which the coded month for the first month is 0:   \text { Linear trend model: }   \begin{array} { | l | r | r | r | r | }  \hline &   { \text { Coefficients } } & \text { Standard Error } &  { t \text { Stat } } &  { \text { P-value } } \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 7950.7564 & 617.6342 & 12.8729 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 212.6503 & 95.1145 & 2.2357 & 0.0494 \\ \hline \end{array}     Quadratic trend model:  \begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &  {t \text { Stat }} &  {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6358.2473 & 417.2692 & 15.2378 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 1168.1558 & 176.3526 & 6.6240 & 0.0001 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month 2 } & -86.8641 & 15.4474 & -5.6232 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \end{array}   Exponential trend model:  \begin{array}{|lrrrr} \hline & \text { Coefficients } & \text { Standard Error } &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3.8912 & 0.0315 & 123.3674 & 0.0000 \\ \hline \text { Coded Month } & 0.0116 & 0.0049 & 2.3957 & 0.0376 \\ \hline \end{array}    \text { First-order autoregressive: }   \begin{array}{|l|r|rrr|} \hline & {\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} & {t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 3132.0951 & 1287.2899 & 2.4331 & 0.0378 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.6823 & 0.1398 & 4.8812 & 0.0009 \\ \hline \end{array}     Second-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{lrrrr} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & \text { Standard Error } &{\text { t Stat }} & {P \text {-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 4968.5789 & 766.9416 & 6.4784 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.9333 & 0.1547 & 6.0316 & 0.0005 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & -0.4487 & 0.1238 & -3.6235 & 0.0085 \\ \hline \end{array}   Third-order autoregressive::  \begin{array}{|l|rrrr|} \hline &{\text { Coefficients }} & {\text { Standard Error }} &{t \text { Stat }} & {\text { P-value }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 6782.7567 & 2105.7115 & 3.2211 & 0.0234 \\ \hline \text { YLag1 } & 0.5481 & 0.3918 & 1.3990 & 0.2207 \\ \hline \text { YLag2 } & 0.0198 & 0.4034 & 0.0490 & 0.9628 \\ \hline \text { YLag3 } & -0.2749 & 0.2234 & -1.2308 & 0.2731 \\ \hline \end{array}  Below is the residual plot of the various models:     -Referring to Table 16-13, you can conclude that the second-order autoregressive model is appropriate at the 5% level of significance. -Referring to Table 16-13, you can conclude that the second-order autoregressive model is appropriate at the 5% level of significance.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(38)

TABLE 16-7 The executive vice-president of a drug manufacturing firm believes that the demand for the firm's most popular drug has been evidencing an exponential trend since 1995. She uses Microsoft Excel to obtain the partial output below. The dependent variable is the log base 10 of the demand for the drug, while the independent variable is years, where 1995 is coded as 0, 1996 is coded as 1, etc. SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R 0.996 R Square 0.992 Adjusted R Square 0.991 Standard Error 0.02831 Observations 12 Coefficients Intercept 1.44 Coded Year 0.068 -Referring to Table 16-7, the forecast for the demand in 2012 is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.9/5
(35)

Given a data set with 15 yearly observations, there are only thirteen 3-year moving averages.

(True/False)
4.8/5
(36)

TABLE 16-12 A local store developed a multiplicative time-series model to forecast its revenues in future quarters, using quarterly data on its revenues during the 4-year period from 2005 to 2009. The following is the resulting regression equation: log₁₀ Y^\hat Y = 6.102 + 0.012 X - 0.129 Q₁ - 0.054 Q₂ + 0.098 Q₃ where Y^\hat Y is the estimated number of contracts in a quarter. X is the coded quarterly value with X = 0 in the first quarter of 2005. Q₁ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the first quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₂ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the second quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. Q₃ is a dummy variable equal to 1 in the third quarter of a year and 0 otherwise. -Referring to Table 16-12, the best interpretation of the coefficient of Q₂ (-0.054)in the regression equation is

(Multiple Choice)
4.8/5
(34)

TABLE 16-4 The number of cases of merlot wine sold by a Paso Robles winery in an 8-year period follows. Year Cases of Wine 2003 270 2004 356 2005 398 2006 456 2007 358 2008 500 2009 410 2010 376 -Referring to Table 16-4, exponential smoothing with a weight or smoothing constant of 0.2 will be used to forecast wine sales. The forecast for 2011 is ________.

(Short Answer)
4.8/5
(36)
Showing 81 - 100 of 168
close modal

Filters

  • Essay(0)
  • Multiple Choice(0)
  • Short Answer(0)
  • True False(0)
  • Matching(0)