Exam 3: How Much Delinquency Is There, and Is Delinquency Increasing

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The "superpredator" myth originated in the mid-1990s as a result of a combination of factors, including media sensationalism, political rhetoric, and fear-mongering. The term was popularized by criminologist John DiIulio, who predicted a wave of violent crime committed by a new generation of young, remorseless, and predatory criminals. This myth was fueled by the perception of a rise in juvenile crime and the fear of "gang-related" violence.

The myth of the superpredator was also perpetuated by politicians and policymakers who sought to appear tough on crime and used it to justify harsher sentencing laws and the expansion of the juvenile justice system. This fear-based narrative led to the implementation of policies such as "zero-tolerance" policing and the widespread incarceration of young people, particularly young people of color.

However, as time passed, it became clear that the superpredator myth was not accurate. Crime rates, including juvenile crime rates, actually began to decline in the mid-1990s and continued to do so in the following decades. Additionally, research has shown that the vast majority of young people, even those involved in criminal activity, do not fit the profile of the remorseless and predatory superpredator.

In hindsight, it is evident that the superpredator myth was a product of fear and misinformation rather than an accurate representation of the realities of youth crime. It served to perpetuate harmful stereotypes and led to the implementation of punitive policies that disproportionately impacted marginalized communities. It is important to critically examine and challenge such myths in order to develop more effective and equitable approaches to addressing crime and supporting young people.

Correct Answer:

Answered by Examlex AI Copilot

The role of immigration in the crime decline is a complex and debated topic. Some studies have shown that immigration may have contributed to the decline in crime rates in the United States. One possible explanation is that immigrants, especially those who come to the U.S. legally, are often motivated to work hard and build a better life for themselves and their families. As a result, they may be less likely to engage in criminal behavior.

Additionally, immigrants may also bring with them a strong sense of community and family values, which can help to create a more stable and cohesive society. This can lead to lower crime rates in immigrant communities.

Furthermore, research has shown that immigrants are less likely to commit crimes than native-born Americans. This may be due to the fact that immigrants are more likely to be deported if they are convicted of a crime, so they have a strong incentive to stay out of trouble.

In terms of immigration trends, the United States has seen an increase in immigration over the past few decades. This increase in immigration has been accompanied by a decline in crime rates. While it is difficult to establish a direct causal relationship between the two, it is clear that the increase in immigration has not led to an increase in crime.

Overall, the role of immigration in the crime decline is a complex and multifaceted issue. While it is clear that immigration has not led to an increase in crime, the exact ways in which immigration has contributed to the decline in crime rates are still being studied and debated.