Chat with AIExam 3: Labeling Theory
Discuss the consequences of labeling theory's emphasis on the labeling process, rather than the violation of a norm, as the starting point for the study of deviance. Give an example of how you would apply labeling theory in examining a concrete case of deviance. What do you see as the strengths and weakness of labeling theory?
(32) 
Answered by Examlex AI CopilotLabeling theory emphasizes the labeling process as the starting point for the study of deviance, rather than focusing on the actual violation of a norm. This means that the theory looks at how individuals and groups are labeled as deviant by society, and how this labeling affects their behavior and self-identity. The consequences of this emphasis are significant, as it shifts the focus from the individual's actions to the societal reaction to those actions. This can lead to a better understanding of the social construction of deviance and the impact of societal reactions on individuals.
For example, let's consider the case of drug addiction. According to labeling theory, an individual who is labeled as a "drug addict" by society may internalize this label and begin to see themselves as deviant. This can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy, where the individual's behavior conforms to the label they have been given. Additionally, the societal reaction to the individual's drug addiction, such as stigmatization and exclusion, can further push them into deviant behavior.
One strength of labeling theory is its focus on the social context of deviance, which can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the causes and consequences of deviant behavior. It also highlights the role of power and social control in the labeling process, shedding light on the unequal distribution of labeling and its impact on marginalized groups.
However, labeling theory has been criticized for its neglect of the initial act of deviance and its overemphasis on the societal reaction. It also has been accused of neglecting the role of individual agency and choice in deviant behavior. Additionally, the theory has been criticized for its limited ability to explain why some individuals resist or reject the deviant label.
In conclusion, labeling theory's emphasis on the labeling process as the starting point for the study of deviance can provide valuable insights into the social construction of deviance and the impact of societal reactions on individuals. However, it also has limitations that should be considered when applying the theory to the study of deviance.
According to Becker, being labeled as deviant has important consequences
(32) 
VerifiedD
Becker, citing Hughes' distinction between master and subordinate statuses, to explain
(37) VerifiedA
Labeling theory holds that deviance is not a quality of the act because it
(36) When Becker suggests that society creates deviance he means that
(28) Explain why Becker distinguishes rule-breaking behavior and the use of the label deviant. Provide and explain an example of rule-breaking behavior that does not result in the label of deviance, and conversely explain how the label of deviant may be applied without there having been rule-breaking behavior.
(36) Labeling theory suggests that the primary thing deviants have in common is
(29) Becker suggests that branding someone as a deviant carries strong consequences for the person labeled deviant in terms of a new master status. Explain how this is the case. Why is this a problem or issue, according to labeling theory?
(40) Labeling theory points out that there is much variability to how others may respond to a given act as deviant, including all of the following EXCEPT
(36) 
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)