Exam 6: Functionalism: The Normal and the Pathological
According to Durkheim, crime is present in
B
Durkheim discusses a society of saints as a social order in which crime will still occur. How is this possible-explain fully.
Durkheim's concept of a society of saints refers to a hypothetical society in which every individual is perfectly moral and adheres strictly to societal norms and values. In this society, there would be no deviant behavior or crime, as everyone would act in accordance with the collective conscience.
However, Durkheim argues that even in a society of saints, crime would still occur. This is because he believes that crime is a normal and necessary part of all societies, serving important functions such as reaffirming societal norms, reinforcing social solidarity, and prompting social change.
In a society of saints, the definition of crime would likely shift to include even minor infractions or deviations from the established moral code. This means that behaviors that are not considered criminal in our current society would be labeled as such in a society of saints, leading to the continued existence of crime.
Additionally, Durkheim suggests that even in a society of saints, individuals may still experience feelings of anomie or alienation, leading them to engage in deviant behavior as a means of seeking connection or purpose. This further supports the idea that crime would still occur in such a society.
Overall, Durkheim's argument is that crime is an inherent part of all societies, and even in a society of saints, there would still be instances of deviant behavior due to the complex nature of human social interaction and the need for social order and change.
Discuss the role of collective sentiments in Durkheim's definition of crime. What role do such sentiments play in his view of the inevitability of crime? Explain.
In order for murder to disappear in society, Durkheim suggests which of the following?
What is the function of crime for society according to Durkheim? Relate his view of the significance of Socrates. Do you agree with Durkheim? Why or why not? Explain.
According to Durkheim, the punishment of Socrates for his crime
Filters
- Essay(0)
- Multiple Choice(0)
- Short Answer(0)
- True False(0)
- Matching(0)