Question 1

Compare and contrast the Institutional Review Board (IRB)and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Accepted Answer

The Institutional Review Board (IRB)reviews the ethical merit of all research involving human subjects conducted within an institution.The mission of the IRB is to provide ethical oversight of research projects.Researchers must complete an IRB proposal for every research study they wish to conduct and it is reviewed by either the IRB chair or the full committee.The IRB ensures that research complies with the three principles set forth in the Belmont Report (beneficence,justice,and respect),and that costs of the research do not outweigh the potential benefits.The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)is a board that reviews the ethical merit and research procedures of all research involving animals conducted within an institution.These governing bodies share the goal of maintaining ethical research.They are different in their focus,with the IRB overseeing research with human participants and the IACUC overseeing research with animal participants.

Question 2

Describe one way that researchers can "massage their data."

Accepted Answer

Massaging data is also referred to as data trimming,cooking data,and mining data.It refers to the unethical process of falsifying,modifying,or omitting data.Falsification occurs when researchers make up their results.It can also occur when researchers remove participants' results without sufficient justification or report on only select variables.Both practices help researchers to confirm hypotheses by revealing results that may not emerge when examining the entire dataset.Researchers can also misrepresent their findings by overstating or drawing conclusions that are not backed up by the data.

Question 3

What is the altruistic perspective and how might it influence an individual who is trying to resolve an ethical dilemma?

Accepted Answer

The altruistic perspective holds that ethical decisions should be based on helping others without personal benefit.In an ethical dilemma one is likely to weigh the potential costs and benefits of a course of action.From the altruistic perspective,the best course of action is the most selfless one.

Question 4

What is the difference between confidentiality and anonymity?

Accepted Answer

Confidentiality is the promise to protec

Question 5

What is beneficence?

Accepted Answer

Beneficence is actively promoting the we

Question 6

How is the utilitarian perspective different from egoism?

Accepted Answer

The utilitarian perspective is the belie

Question 7

Yolanda is conducting a research study that is expected to create psychological distress in her participants.How can she minimize the residual effects of this stress so as to uphold the APA ethical guideline of beneficence and nonmaleficence?

Accepted Answer

Psychological harm is the toll that stud

Question 8

What is minimal risk and what level of IRB review is required for studies containing minimal risk?

Accepted Answer

Minimal risk is the level of risk typica

Question 9

Imagine that you are the chair of your university's IRB committee.You receive a research protocol that describes a study examining the limitations of human digestion.The proposed procedure requires participants to eat until they become sick in an effort to advance the current understanding of differential limits on eating behavior.Explain why you would approve or reject this research proposal.

Accepted Answer

This proposal appears to investigate a w

Question 10

What is the file drawer problem?

Accepted Answer

The file drawer problem is a bias in the

Question 11

Marsha would like to examine self-control in toddlers.In order to do this,she has designed a study in which children will be given a marshmallow and told that if they don't eat it until the researcher returns to the room they will be given a second marshmallow.However,if they eat the marshmallow before the researcher returns they will not be given a second one.Explain to Marsha what level of IRB review this study will require.

Accepted Answer

This study will require a full review by

Question 12

Explain how the Tuskegee Syphilis Study violated the ethical principle of justice?

Accepted Answer

The Tuskegee Syphilis Study violated all

Question 13

How are the Nuremberg Code for Human Experimentation and the Belmont Report similar and how are they different?

Accepted Answer

The Nuremberg Code is a set of research

Question 14

List and define three of the American Psychological Association's five principles for conducting ethical research.

Accepted Answer

The five ethical guidelines put forth by

Question 15

Why does it matter if psychologists fail to adhere to the APA ethical guideline of scientific integrity and publish falsified results?

Accepted Answer

Many of the guidelines that govern resea

Exam 3: D: Ethics: Making Ethical Decisions in Research

Compare and contrast the Institutional Review Board (IRB)and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

Describe one way that researchers can "massage their data."

What is the altruistic perspective and how might it influence an individual who is trying to resolve an ethical dilemma?

What is the difference between confidentiality and anonymity?

What is beneficence?

How is the utilitarian perspective different from egoism?

Yolanda is conducting a research study that is expected to create psychological distress in her participants.How can she minimize the residual effects of this stress so as to uphold the APA ethical guideline of beneficence and nonmaleficence?

What is minimal risk and what level of IRB review is required for studies containing minimal risk?

What is the file drawer problem?

Explain how the Tuskegee Syphilis Study violated the ethical principle of justice?

How are the Nuremberg Code for Human Experimentation and the Belmont Report similar and how are they different?

List and define three of the American Psychological Association's five principles for conducting ethical research.

Why does it matter if psychologists fail to adhere to the APA ethical guideline of scientific integrity and publish falsified results?

A: Psychology As Science: Thinking Like a Researcher

B: Psychology As Science: Thinking Like a Researcher

C: Psychology As Science: Thinking Like a Researcher

D: Psychology As Science: Thinking Like a Researcher

Psychology As Science: Part 1

Psychology As Science: Part 2

A: The Research Process: Ideas to Innovations

B: The Research Process: Ideas to Innovations

C: The Research Process: Ideas to Innovations

D: The Research Process: Ideas to Innovations

The Research Process: Part 1

The Research Process: Part 2

A: Ethics: Making Ethical Decisions in Research

B: Ethics: Making Ethical Decisions in Research

C: Ethics: Making Ethical Decisions in Research

Ethics: Part 1

Ethics: Part 2

A: The Psychologists Toolbox: Tools for Building Better Designs

B: The Psychologists Toolbox: Tools for Building Better Designs

C: The Psychologists Toolbox: Tools for Building Better Designs

D: The Psychologists Toolbox: Tools for Building Better Designs

The Psychologists: Part 1

The Psychologists: Part 2

A: Qualitative Research: Getting Into the Mind of a Serial Killer

B: Qualitative Research: Getting Into the Mind of a Serial Killer

C: Qualitative Research: Getting Into the Mind of a Serial Killer

D: Qualitative Research: Getting Into the Mind of a Serial Killer

Qualitative Research: Part 1

Qualitative Research: Part 2

A: Observational Research: The Many Forms of Discipline in Parents Bag of Tricks

B: Observational Research: The Many Forms of Discipline in Parents Bag of Tricks

C: Observational Research: The Many Forms of Discipline in Parents Bag of Tricks

D: Observational Research: The Many Forms of Discipline in Parents Bag of Tricks

Observational Research: Part 1

Observational Research: Part 2

A: Survey Design and Scale Construction: Is Going Greek a Great Idea

B: Survey Design and Scale Construction: Is Going Greek a Great Idea

C: Survey Design and Scale Construction: Is Going Greek a Great Idea

D: Survey Design and Scale Construction: Is Going Greek a Great Idea

Survey Design and Scale Construction: Part 1

Survey Design and Scale Construction: Part 2

A: Two-Group Design: Texting: I Cant Get You Out of My Mind

B: Two-Group Design: Texting: I Cant Get You Out of My Mind

C: Two-Group Design: Texting: I Cant Get You Out of My Mind

D: Two-Group Design: Texting: I Cant Get You Out of My Mind

Two-Group Design: Part 1

Two-Group Design: Part 2

A: Multi-Group Design: Im Feeling Hot, but Is the Earth Hot, Too

B: Multi-Group Design: Im Feeling Hot, but Is the Earth Hot, Too

C: Multi-Group Design: Im Feeling Hot, but Is the Earth Hot, Too

D: Multi-Group Design: Im Feeling Hot, but Is the Earth Hot, Too

Multi-Group Design: Part 1

Multi-Group Design: Part 2

A: Within-Subjects Designs: Can Watching Reality Tv Shows Be Good for Us

B: Within-Subjects Designs: Can Watching Reality Tv Shows Be Good for Us

C: Within-Subjects Designs: Can Watching Reality Tv Shows Be Good for Us

D: Within-Subjects Designs: Can Watching Reality Tv Shows Be Good for Us

Within-Subjects Designs: Part 1

Within-Subjects Designs: Part 2

A: Factorial Design: I Lost My Phone Number, Can I Borrow Yours Do Pickup Lines Really Work

B: Factorial Design: I Lost My Phone Number, Can I Borrow Yours Do Pickup Lines Really Work

C: Factorial Design: I Lost My Phone Number, Can I Borrow Yours Do Pickup Lines Really Work

D: Factorial Design: I Lost My Phone Number, Can I Borrow Yours Do Pickup Lines Really Work

Factorial Design: Part 1

Factorial Design: Part 2

A: Mixed Design: Which Therapy Is Best for Treating Eating Disorders